BACKGROUND: S100B protein measurement in blood is proposed to exclude the presence of computed tomography (CT) lesions after minor head injury (MHI). We aimed to validate S100B as an accurate and valuable screening tool for MHI diagnosis in a large multicenter study, as well as: 1) to evaluate whether a second S100B blood level determination 3 h after the first one would be informative; 2) to compare the bioclinical performances of the two commercially available automated methods of measurement of S100B for the screening of patients. METHODS: Four thousand and thirty MHI subjects were enrolled in a prospective observational multicenter study; results for serum S100B measurement determined within 3 h after the clinical event (H0) then at H3 were compared to that of cranial CT scans performed with 6 h following the presentation to emergency department. Both the Diasorin and the Roche Diagnostics assays were systematically performed. RESULTS: Cerebral lesions on CT scan were identified with sensitivity and negative-predictive value (NPV) of 96.3% and 99.4% (Diasorin, 1 dissonant case), and of 100% and 100% (Roche Diagnostics, no dissonant case). Sensitivity and NPV at H3 appeared lower than those at H0, due to the rapid decrease in S100B levels. CONCLUSIONS: Serum S100B level on admission of patients with MHI is an accurate and useful screening tool to exclude intracranial lesions. Performing a second late S100B level determination is not informative. The two automated immunoassays appear usable in a similar manner, although the two methods are not interchangeable.
BACKGROUND:S100B protein measurement in blood is proposed to exclude the presence of computed tomography (CT) lesions after minor head injury (MHI). We aimed to validate S100B as an accurate and valuable screening tool for MHI diagnosis in a large multicenter study, as well as: 1) to evaluate whether a second S100B blood level determination 3 h after the first one would be informative; 2) to compare the bioclinical performances of the two commercially available automated methods of measurement of S100B for the screening of patients. METHODS: Four thousand and thirty MHI subjects were enrolled in a prospective observational multicenter study; results for serum S100B measurement determined within 3 h after the clinical event (H0) then at H3 were compared to that of cranial CT scans performed with 6 h following the presentation to emergency department. Both the Diasorin and the Roche Diagnostics assays were systematically performed. RESULTS:Cerebral lesions on CT scan were identified with sensitivity and negative-predictive value (NPV) of 96.3% and 99.4% (Diasorin, 1 dissonant case), and of 100% and 100% (Roche Diagnostics, no dissonant case). Sensitivity and NPV at H3 appeared lower than those at H0, due to the rapid decrease in S100B levels. CONCLUSIONS: Serum S100B level on admission of patients with MHI is an accurate and useful screening tool to exclude intracranial lesions. Performing a second late S100B level determination is not informative. The two automated immunoassays appear usable in a similar manner, although the two methods are not interchangeable.
Authors: Jing Li; Ruo-Bing Shan; Rui-Hai Liu; Ying-Jun Xu; Ni-Yan Qu; Gui-Mei Pan; Na Zhang; Na Yang; Zhen-Zhen Chen; Wen-Xiang Zhang; Zi-Pu Li Journal: Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi Date: 2017-08
Authors: Michael Amoo; Jack Henry; Philip J O'Halloran; Paul Brennan; Mohammed Ben Husien; Matthew Campbell; John Caird; Mohsen Javadpour; Gerard F Curley Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Svetlana A Dambinova; Joseph C Maroon; Alicia M Sufrinko; John David Mullins; Eugenia V Alexandrova; Alexander A Potapov Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Julien Blais Lécuyer; Éric Mercier; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Patrick M Archambault; Jean-Marc Chauny; Simon Berthelot; Jérôme Frenette; Jeff Perry; Ian Stiell; Marcel Émond; Jacques Lee; Eddy Lang; Andrew McRae; Valérie Boucher; Natalie Le Sage Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Stefania Mondello; Firas Kobeissy; Annarita Vestri; Ronald L Hayes; Patrick M Kochanek; Rachel P Berger Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Stefania Mondello; Abayomi Sorinola; Endre Czeiter; Zoltán Vámos; Krisztina Amrein; Anneliese Synnot; Emma Donoghue; János Sándor; Kevin K W Wang; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Ewout W Steyerberg; David K Menon; Andrew I R Maas; Andras Buki Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 5.269