Literature DB >> 24225130

Value-added reporting of antinuclear antibody testing by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis.

Sofie Schouwers, Myriam Bonnet, Patrick Verschueren, René Westhovens, Daniel Blockmans, Godelieve Mariën, Xavier Bossuyt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automated systems for antinuclear antibody analysis are being introduced. The aim was to evaluate whether automated quantitative reading of fluorescence intensity is clinically relevant and allows for value-added reporting of test results.
METHODS: Consecutive samples (n=260) were used to correlate fluorescence intensity with end-point titer. Moreover, 434 samples from controls (150 healthy blood donors, 150 chronic fatigue syndrome, and 134 diseased controls) and 252 samples (obtained at diagnosis) from patients with systemic rheumatic diseases were screened for antinuclear antibodies (1:80) on HEp-2 cells using NOVA View, and likelihood ratios were calculated for fluorescence intensity result intervals.
RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between end-point titer and fluorescence intensity. Likelihood ratios for a systemic rheumatic disease increased with increasing fluorescence intensity. The likelihood ratio for a systemic rheumatic disease was 0.06, 0.18, 0.51, 5.3, and 37.5 for a fluorescence intensity of ≤66, 67-150, 151-300, 301-1000, >1000, respectively. A range of 31%-37% of the patients with Sjögren's syndrome, systemic sclerosis or systemic lupus erythematosus had fluorescence intensities >1000.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of fluorescence intensity by automated antinuclear antibody analysis offers clinically useful information. Likelihood ratios based on fluorescence intensity test result intervals aid with the interpretation of automated antinuclear antibody analysis and allow value-added reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24225130     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies.

Authors:  Michael Mahler; Pier-Luigi Meroni; Xavier Bossuyt; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.818

2.  The Reliability of a Novel Automated System for ANA Immunofluorescence Analysis in Daily Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Mohammed Alsuwaidi; Margit Dollinger; Martin Fleck; Boris Ehrenstein
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  Performance of an Automated Fluorescence Antinuclear Antibody Image Analyzer.

Authors:  In Young Yoo; Jong Won Oh; Hoon Suk Cha; Eun Mi Koh; Eun Suk Kang
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Interpretation of ANA indirect immunofluorescence test outside the darkroom using NOVA view compared to manual microscopy.

Authors:  Susan S Copple; Troy D Jaskowski; Rashelle Giles; Harry R Hill
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 5.  Novel clinical and diagnostic aspects of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies.

Authors:  Johannes Schulte-Pelkum; Antonella Radice; Gary L Norman; Marcos Lόpez Hoyos; Gabriella Lakos; Carol Buchner; Lucile Musset; Makoto Miyara; Laura Stinton; Michael Mahler
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.818

6.  International consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP): the bumpy road towards a consensus on reporting ANA results.

Authors:  Jan Damoiseaux; Carlos A von Mühlen; Ignacio Garcia-De La Torre; Orlando Gabriel Carballo; Wilson de Melo Cruvinel; Paulo Luiz Carvalho Francescantonio; Marvin J Fritzler; Manfred Herold; Tsuneyo Mimori; Minoru Satoh; Luis E C Andrade; Edward K L Chan; Karsten Conrad
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2016-01-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.