Literature DB >> 24224986

Relationship between postural stability and spatial hearing.

Xuan Zhong1, William A Yost.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maintaining balance is known to be a multisensory process that uses information from different sensory organs. Although it has been known for a long time that spatial hearing cues provide humans with moderately accurate abilities to localize sound sources, how the auditory system interacts with balance mediated by the vestibular system remains largely a mystery.
PURPOSE: The primary goal of the current study was to determine whether auditory spatial cues obtained from a fixed sound source can help human participants balance themselves as compared to conditions in which participants use vision. RESEARCH
DESIGN: The experiment uses modified versions of conventional clinical tests: the Tandem Romberg test and the Fukuda Stepping test. In the Tandem Romberg test, participants stand with their feet in a heel-to-toe position, and try to maintain balance for 40 sec. In the Fukuda Stepping test, a participant is asked to close his or her eyes and to march in place for 100 steps. The sway and angular deviation of each participant was measured with and without vision and spatial auditory cues. An auditory spatial reference was provided by presenting a broadband noise source from a loudspeaker directly in front of the participant located 1-2 m away. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 19 participants (11 women and 8 men; mean age = 27 yr; age range = 18∼52 yr), voluntarily participated in the experiment. All participants had normal vision, hearing, and vestibular function. INTERVENTION: The primary intervention was the use of a broadband noise source to provide an auditory spatial referent for balance measurements in the Tandem Romberg test and Fukuda Stepping test. Conditions were also tested in which the participants had their eyes opened or closed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A head tracker recorded the position of the participant's head for the Tandem Romberg test. The angular deviation of the feet after 100 steps was measured in the Fukuda Stepping test. An average distance or angle moved by the head or feet was calculated relative to the head or feet resting position for each test. The average head sway or angular deviation was measured in an eyes-open condition (no sound), eyes-closed condition (no sound), and an eyes-closed condition with sound. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for both tests.
RESULTS: The results showed a significant benefit in postural stability in both experiments when spatial auditory cues were present (p < .01). For the Tandem Romberg test, the benefit from spatial auditory cues alone is a 9% reduction in mean sway, as compared to 44% from visual cues alone. For the Fukuda Stepping test, the benefit from spatial auditory cues alone is a 76% reduction in mean body sway, as compared to 98% from visual cues alone.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated a connection between spatial hearing and balance. The experiments showed that a single fixed sound source can provide sufficient spatial cues for the central nervous system to better control postural stability. The compensation effect that the vestibular system receives from the auditory cues, however, is weaker than that received from visual cues. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24224986     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.24.9.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  17 in total

1.  Early aging and postural control while listening and responding.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard van Emmerik; Jacob J Banks; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory white noise reduces postural fluctuations even in the absence of vision.

Authors:  Jessica Marie Ross; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  How many images are in an auditory scene?

Authors:  Xuan Zhong; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  [Influence of hearing on vestibulospinal control in healthy subjects. German version].

Authors:  I Seiwerth; J Jonen; T Rahne; R Schwesig; A Lauenroth; T E Hullar; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Influence of hearing on vestibulospinal control in healthy subjects.

Authors:  I Seiwerth; J Jonen; T Rahne; R Schwesig; A Lauenroth; T E Hullar; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Improvements in Gait With Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Corey S Shayman; Gammon M Earhart; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Frequency-dependent integration of auditory and vestibular cues for self-motion perception.

Authors:  Corey S Shayman; Robert J Peterka; Frederick J Gallun; Yonghee Oh; Nai-Yuan N Chang; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sound localization in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy.

Authors:  Olivier Peetermans; Bieke Dobbels; Griet Mertens; Julie Moyaert; Raymond van de Berg; Olivier Vanderveken; Paul Van de Heyning; Angélica Pérez Fornos; Nils Guinand; Marc J W Lammers; Vincent Van Rompaey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  The effect of spatial auditory landmarks on ambulation.

Authors:  Adham M Karim; Kavelin Rumalla; Laurie A King; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Postural and Head Control Given Different Environmental Contexts.

Authors:  Anat V Lubetzky; Jennifer L Kelly; Bryan D Hujsak; Jenny Liu; Daphna Harel; Maura Cosetti
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.