Literature DB >> 24224804

Allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Gösta Gahrton1, Amrita Krishnan.   

Abstract

Allogeneic transplantation has the potential to cure subgroups of patients with multiple myeloma, but its role is controversial due to high transplant-related mortality. Therefore, myeloablative allogeneic transplantation has fallen out of favor. Allogeneic transplantation using reduced-intensity conditioning (RICallo) has lower transplant-related mortality and may be an option for subgroups of patients. Upfront tandem autologous/RICallo (auto/RICallo) was shown to be superior to single auto or tandem auto/auto in both progression-free and overall survival in two studies with long-term follow-up, while four similarly designed studies with shorter follow-up did not show a significant advantage. All studies included patients less than 70 years of age. No study has shown that the auto/RICallo approach is inferior to auto or auto/auto. There have been indications that poor-risk cytogenetics may be overcome by the auto/RICallo approach. Encouraging results have also been seen in treatment of relapsed patients. Small studies indicate that combining allogeneic transplant with new proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs may further improve results. Prospective studies including these drugs for induction, conditioning and post-allogeneic transplant maintenance are warranted and planned. New cell therapies, such as with natural killer cells have shown encouraging results in experimental animals and should be tried in combination with allotransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24224804     DOI: 10.1586/17474086.2014.857270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol        ISSN: 1747-4094            Impact factor:   2.929


  5 in total

1.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in Europe: trends and outcomes over 25 years. A study by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party.

Authors:  M Sobh; M Michallet; G Gahrton; S Iacobelli; A van Biezen; S Schönland; E Petersen; N Schaap; F Bonifazi; L Volin; E Meijer; D Niederwieser; J El Cheikh; R Tabrizi; N Fegeux; J Finke; D Bunjes; J Cornelissen; H Einsele; B Bruno; M Potter; R Fanin; M Mohty; L Garderet; N Kröger
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  In search of the optimal platform for Post-Allogeneic SCT immunotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Oostvogels; S M Uniken Venema; M de Witte; R Raymakers; J Kuball; N Kröger; M C Minnema
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Autologous stem cell transplantation versus novel drugs or conventional chemotherapy for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma after previous ASCT.

Authors:  M Grövdal; H Nahi; G Gahrton; J Liwing; A Waage; N Abildgaard; P T Pedersen; J Hammerstrøm; A Laaksonen; P Bazia; V Terava; H Ollikainen; R Silvennoinen; M Putkonen; P Anttila; K Porkka; K Remes
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Immunologic approaches for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Leo Rasche; Niels Weinhold; Gareth J Morgan; Frits van Rhee; Faith E Davies
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  End points and statistical considerations in immuno-oncology trials: impact on multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antje Hoering; Brian Durie; Hongwei Wang; John Crowley
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.404

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.