Literature DB >> 24224521

Rationale and methodology for a multicentre randomised trial of fibrinolysis for pulmonary embolism that includes quality of life outcomes.

Jeffrey A Kline1, Jackeline Hernandez, Melanie M Hogg, Alan E Jones, D Mark Courtney, Christopher Kabrhel, Kristen E Nordenholz, Deborah B Diercks, Matthew T Rondina, James R Klinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) has a low mortality rate but can degrade functional capacity.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to provide rationale, methodology, and initial findings of a multicentre, randomised trial of fibrinolysis for PE that used a composite end-point, including quality of life measures.
METHODS: This investigator-initiated study was funded by a contract between a corporate partner and the investigator's hospital (the prime site). The investigator was the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sponsor. The prime site subcontracted, indemnified, and trained consortia members. Consenting, normotensive patients with PE and right ventricular strain (by echocardiography or biomarkers) received low-molecular-weight heparin and random assignment to a single bolus of tenecteplase or placebo in double-blinded fashion. The outcomes were: (i) in-hospital rate of intubation, vasopressor support, and major haemorrhage, or (ii) at 90 days, death, recurrent PE, or composite that defined poor quality of life (echocardiography, 6 min walk test and surveys). The planned sample size was n = 200.
RESULTS: Eight sites enrolled 87 patients over 5 years. The ratio of patients screened for each enrolled was 7.4 to 1, equating to 11 h screening time per patient enrolled. Primary barrier to enrolment was the cost of screening. Two patients died (2.5%, 95%CI [0-8%]), one developed shock, but 18 (22%, 95%CI: [13-30%]) had a poor quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: An investigator-initiated, FDA-regulated, multicentre trial of fibrinolysis for submassive PE was conducted, but was limited by screening costs and a low mortality rate. Quality of life measurements might represent a more important patient-centred end-point.
© 2013 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  controlled trial; fibrinolysis; indemnification; methodology; thrombolysis; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24224521     DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  4 in total

1.  Contribution of fibrinolysis to the physical component summary of the SF-36 after acute submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Lauren K Stewart; Geoffrey W Peitz; Kristen E Nordenholz; D Mark Courtney; Christopher Kabrhel; Alan E Jones; Matthew T Rondina; Deborah B Diercks; James R Klinger; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Zhiliang Zuo; Jirong Yue; Bi Rong Dong; Taixiang Wu; Guan J Liu; Qiukui Hao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-15

3.  Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Qiukui Hao; Bi Rong Dong; Jirong Yue; Taixiang Wu; Guan J Liu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-18

4.  Variable Resistance to Plasminogen Activator Initiated Fibrinolysis for Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  William B Stubblefield; Nathan J Alves; Matthew T Rondina; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.