Literature DB >> 24224269

Feeding behavior comparison of soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) biotypes on different soybean genotypes.

Predeesh Chandran1, John C Reese, Shah Alam Khan, Dechun Wang, William Schapaugh, Leslie R Campbell.   

Abstract

Soybean aphids have become a serious pest of soybean, Glycine max L. (Merrill), since they were first detected in North America in 2000. Three soybean aphid biotypes have been documented in the United States in the last 10 yr, but few studies have been done on their feeding behavior in the United States The Electrical Penetration Graph is a convenient and successful tool to study the feeding behavior of piercing and sucking insects. This is the first attempt to study the feeding behavior differences between biotype 1 and biotype 2 on soybean genotypes using the Electrical Penetration Graph technique, and includes both resistant and susceptible soybean genotypes from Kansas and Michigan. The experiments were run for 9 h each for each genotype with a total of eight channels at a time. Results indicated that aphids feeding on susceptible genotypes had a significantly greater duration of sieve element phase than when feeding on resistant genotypes. Furthermore, the time taken to reach the first sieve element phase in resistant genotypes was significantly greater than in susceptible genotypes. Most of the aphids reached sieve element phase (> 90%) in susceptible genotypes, but only a few (< 30%) reached sieve element phase in resistant genotypes during the 9-h recording period; however, we found no differences in any other probing phases between resistant and susceptible genotypes except the number of potential drops in biotype 2. Thus, the resistance was largely associated with phloem tissues. Therefore, some biochemical, physical, or morphological factors could affect stylet penetration of aphids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24224269     DOI: 10.1603/ec13126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  8 in total

1.  Probing behavior of the corn leafhopper Dalbulus maidis on susceptible and resistant maize hybrids.

Authors:  Pablo Carpane; María Inés Catalano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Differences in stylet sheath occurrence and the fibrous ring (sclerenchyma) between xCitroncirus plants relatively resistant or susceptible to adults of the Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae).

Authors:  El-Desouky Ammar; Matthew L Richardson; Zaid Abdo; David G Hall; Robert G Shatters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Reduced phloem uptake of Myzus persicae on an aphid resistant pepper accession.

Authors:  Mengjing Sun; Roeland E Voorrips; Greet Steenhuis-Broers; Wendy Van't Westende; Ben Vosman
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  Antixenosis in Glycine max (L.) Merr against Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris).

Authors:  Katarzyna Stec; Bożena Kordan; Iwona Sergiel; Magdalena Biesaga; Joanna Mroczek; Jan Bocianowski; Beata Gabryś
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Virulent Diuraphis noxia Aphids Over-Express Calcium Signaling Proteins to Overcome Defenses of Aphid-Resistant Wheat Plants.

Authors:  Deepak K Sinha; Predeesh Chandran; Alicia E Timm; Lina Aguirre-Rojas; C Michael Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Aphid populations showing differential levels of virulence on Capsicum accessions.

Authors:  Mengjing Sun; Roeland E Voorrips; Ben Vosman
Journal:  Insect Sci       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.262

7.  Probing behaviors and their plasticity for the aphid Sitobion avenae on three alternative host plants.

Authors:  Xianliang Huang; Deguang Liu; Xiaoning Cui; Xiaoqin Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Source of Rag5-Mediated Resistance to Soybean Aphids Is Located in the Stem.

Authors:  Kumud Joshi; Joshua L Baumgardner; Madison MacPhail; Shailesh R Acharya; Elizabeth Blotevogel; Franck E Dayan; Punya Nachappa; Vamsi J Nalam
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.753

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.