Literature DB >> 24224136

Publication trends in noninvasive cardiovascular imaging: 1991-2011: a retrospective observational study.

Sobia Mujtaba1, Jessica M Peña, Mohan Pamerla, Cynthia C Taub.   

Abstract

The last twenty years have seen an explosive growth in cardiovascular disease research. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the characteristics of published research in the field of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging research from 1991-2011. Our aims were to determine: (1) the origin of the studies (international or from the U.S.) (2) differences in funding sources for U.S. publications and (3) if there has been an evolving trend pertaining to the mode of imaging. We evaluated characteristics of original research articles from Circulation, Circulation cardiovascular imaging, Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), Journal of the American College of Cardiology cardiovascular imaging, Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine for the years 1991-91, 2001-02 and 2010-11. To establish trends for contributions for U.S. based studies and proportions of U.S. based studies receiving NIH funding in the study period, data was compared using a chi-square test. A two sided p value of less than or equal to 0.05 was used as the threshold for significance. Differences in modes of imaging under study were made by comparing average number of publications between the data sets in the study period using a t-test analysis. A total of 5431 studies were reviewed; 594 studies were selected as per the standardized abstraction criteria. U.S. based publications outnumbered international publications; its' share declined from 77% in 1991-92 to 57% in 2010-2011 (p<0.0001). Funding for U.S. publications by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) remained static (1991-92: 40%; 2001-02: 49%; 2010-11: 42%). A decline was seen in the investigation of echocardiography (47%, p=0.44); cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies grew 6.5 times (p=0.002) and 7-fold (p=0.01) respectively. Nuclear cardiology imaging fell by more than 50% (p=0.02). The last twenty years have seen a globalization of research in non-invasive cardiovascular imaging with a shift in focus towards investigation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The decline in U.S. based publications coupled with a stasis in NIH funding may call for increased federal support for non-invasive imaging research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac; Doppler; MRI; National Institutes of Health; cardiovascular research; computed tomography; diagnostic techniques; echocardiography; funding; imaging

Year:  2013        PMID: 24224136      PMCID: PMC3819584     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 2160-200X


  18 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging: who does it and how important is it to the practice of radiology?

Authors:  David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Jonathan H Sunshine; Michael J Pentecost
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  History of the evolution of echocardiography.

Authors:  Ramesh M Gowda; Ijaz A Khan; Balendu C Vasavada; Terrence J Sacchi; Riti Patel
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Inpatient CT and MRI utilization: trends in the academic hospital setting.

Authors:  Rajan Agarwal; Meredith Bergey; Seema Sonnad; Howard Butowsky; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Michael H Bleshman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  History of echocardiography and its future applications in medicine.

Authors:  Vijay K Krishnamoorthy; Partho P Sengupta; Federico Gentile; Bijoy K Khandheria
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Who gets paid for diagnostic imaging, and how much?

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Maitino; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Recent trends in utilization of cardiovascular imaging: how important are they for radiology?

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Increased funding for NIH: a biomedical science perspective.

Authors:  W R Brinkley; J Wood; H H Garrison
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The magnitude and nature of unfunded published cardiovascular research.

Authors:  Tuan V Mai; Donna L Agan; Paul Clopton; Glenn Collins; Anthony N DeMaria
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Cardiovascular imaging research at the crossroads.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; James K Min; Rory Hachamovitch; Eric D Peterson; Robert C Hendel; Pamela K Woodard; Daniel S Berman; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03

10.  The impact of National Institutes of Health funding on U.S. cardiovascular disease research.

Authors:  Radmila Lyubarova; Brandon K Itagaki; Michael W Itagaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Comparison between Quantitative Gated Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy and Strain Echocardiography as Indicators of Ventricular Functions in Patients with Anterior Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Seyhan Karacavus; Ahmet Celik; Ahmet Tutus; Mustafa Kula; Abdurrahman Oguzhan; Ibrahim Ozdogru; Nihat Kalay
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.