Literature DB >> 24224129

The Social Security Death Index (SSDI) most accurately reflects true survival for older oncology patients.

Justin T Huntington1, Mathew Butterfield, James Fisher, Daniel Torrent, Mark Bloomston.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ability to ascertain survival information is important for retrospective and prospective studies. Two databases that can be used are the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) and the National Death Index (NDI). Although the NDI is more complete, there are advantages to the SSDI such as ease of use and cost. The intent of this study was to determine accuracy of the SSDI.
METHODS: Publically available data on all known deceased individuals in the state of Ohio in 2003 were obtained from the State of Ohio Department of Health. A random sample of 63,557 of these were compared to the SSDI to identify risk factor for inclusion/exclusion.
RESULTS: Overall, 94.7% of all death records were confirmed by the SSDI. Age at death, gender, race, ethnicity, and cause of death were all found to significantly affect the likelihood of inclusion. Specifically, people aged 18-24 were included only 79.8% of the time compared to 96.2% for those over the age of 65. Also, malignancy as cause of death resulted in a 95.3% inclusion while trauma as a cause of death led to 86.5% inclusion. While Caucasians had an inclusion of 95.6%, African Americans were included only 87.8% of the time. Hispanics and women also had lower inclusion rates. DISCUSSION: The SSDI is a strong tool for following up on participants lost to follow up in certain populations but is weaker in others. The SSDI would be particularly useful in a population that is largely older, Caucasian, or has malignant disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NDI; SSDI; Social; death; index; security; survival

Year:  2013        PMID: 24224129      PMCID: PMC3816971     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  11 in total

1.  A comparison of the National Death Index and Social Security Administration databases to ascertain vital status.

Authors:  T L Lash; R A Silliman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Strategies for using the National Death Index and the Social Security Administration for death ascertainment in large occupational cohort mortality studies.

Authors:  Nancy C Wojcik; Wendy W Huebner; Gail Jorgensen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The costs of searching for deaths: National Death Index vs Social Security Administration.

Authors:  A Kraut; E Chan; P J Landrigan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Bias in clinical research.

Authors:  G Tripepi; K J Jager; F W Dekker; C Wanner; C Zoccali
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Comparison of National Death Index and World Wide Web death searches.

Authors:  H D Sesso; R S Paffenbarger; I M Lee
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  An evaluation of the Social Security Administration master beneficiary record file and the National Death Index in the ascertainment of vital status.

Authors:  D N Wentworth; J D Neaton; W L Rasmussen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Underascertainment of deaths using social security records: a recommended solution to a little-known problem.

Authors:  Jeanine M Buchanich; David G Dolan; Gary M Marsh; Jaime Madrigano
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  The impact on National Death Index ascertainment of limiting submissions to Social Security Administration Death Master File matches in epidemiologic studies of mortality.

Authors:  Sigurd W Hermansen; Michael F Leitzmann; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Min-Woong Sohn; Noreen Arnold; Charles Maynard; Denise M Hynes
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2006-04-10

10.  Use of the Social Security Administration Death Master File for ascertainment of mortality status.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Brian W Whitcomb
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2004-03-05
View more
  23 in total

1.  2015 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: Prognostication in Patients With Long Bone Metastases: Does a Boosting Algorithm Improve Survival Estimates?

Authors:  Stein J Janssen; Andrea S van der Heijden; Maarten van Dijke; John E Ready; Kevin A Raskin; Marco L Ferrone; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Are Allogeneic Blood Transfusions Associated With Decreased Survival After Surgery for Long-bone Metastatic Fractures?

Authors:  Stein J Janssen; Yvonne Braun; John E Ready; Kevin A Raskin; Marco L Ferrone; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Alive or dead: Validity of the Social Security Administration Death Master File after 2011.

Authors:  Matthew A Levin; Hung-Mo Lin; Gautham Prabhakar; Patrick J McCormick; Natalia N Egorova
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Two Suspected Worksite or Occupational Cancer Clusters Investigated Using the Cancer Data Registry and Multiple Primary Standardized Incidence Ratios in SEER *Stat-Idaho, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Mariana Rosenthal; Christopher J Johnson; Steve Scoppa; Kris Carter
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2016

5.  Do inferences about mortality rates and disparities vary by source of mortality information?

Authors:  John Robert Warren; Carolina Milesi; Karen Grigorian; Melissa Humphries; Chandra Muller; Eric Grodsky
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Hereditary Pancreatitis in the United States: Survival and Rates of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Celeste A Shelton; Chandraprakash Umapathy; Kimberly Stello; Dhiraj Yadav; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Routinely reported ejection fraction and mortality in clinical practice: where does the nadir of risk lie?

Authors:  Gregory J Wehner; Linyuan Jing; Christopher M Haggerty; Jonathan D Suever; Joseph B Leader; Dustin N Hartzel; H Lester Kirchner; Joseph N A Manus; Nick James; Zina Ayar; Patrick Gladding; Christopher W Good; John G F Cleland; Brandon K Fornwalt
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Serum alkaline phosphatase is a prognostic marker in bone metastatic disease of the extremity.

Authors:  Quirina C B S Thio; Aditya V Karhade; Emily Notman; Kevin A Raskin; Santiago A Lozano-Calderón; Marco L Ferrone; Jos A M Bramer; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-17

9.  Development and Internal Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Preoperative Survival Prediction of Extremity Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Quirina C B S Thio; Aditya V Karhade; Bas JJ Bindels; Paul T Ogink; Jos A M Bramer; Marco L Ferrone; Santiago Lozano Calderón; Kevin A Raskin; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Thirty-day Postoperative Complications After Surgery For Metastatic Long Bone Disease Are Associated With Higher Mortality at 1 Year.

Authors:  Bas J J Bindels; Quirina C B S Thio; Kevin A Raskin; Marco L Ferrone; Santiago A Lozano Calderón; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.