Literature DB >> 24224120

Are Markov and semi-Markov models flexible enough for cognitive panel data?

Richard J Kryscio1, Erin L Abner.   

Abstract

Markov chains and semi-Markov models are standard tools used to describe the flow of subjects from health into various stages of a disease. Applications of these techniques face challenges when modeling the flow of elderly subjects through cognitive states into dementia due to the interval censoring of the entry into cognitive states, the transient nature of pre-dementia cognitive states, time-dependent risk factors, missing data, selection bias, and clinical diagnoses that may not agree with the gold standard diagnoses obtained at autopsy. There is a need to make these tools more flexible if they are to be used effectively when analyzing cognitive panel data.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24224120      PMCID: PMC3820113          DOI: 10.4172/2155-6180.1000e122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biom Biostat


  16 in total

1.  Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Thomas G Beach; Sarah E Monsell; Leslie E Phillips; Walter Kukull
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.685

2.  Statistical methods for panel data from a semi-Markov process, with application to HPV.

Authors:  Minhee Kang; Stephen W Lagakos
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Shared random effects analysis of multi-state Markov models: application to a longitudinal study of transitions to dementia.

Authors:  Juan C Salazar; Frederick A Schmitt; Lei Yu; Marta M Mendiondo; Richard J Kryscio
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Risk factors for transitions from normal to mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

Authors:  R J Kryscio; F A Schmitt; J C Salazar; M S Mendiondo; W R Markesbery
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  National estimates of the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in the United States.

Authors:  Ron Brookmeyer; Denis A Evans; Liesi Hebert; Kenneth M Langa; Steven G Heeringa; Brenda L Plassman; Walter A Kukull
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Multi-stage transitional models with random effects and their application to the Einstein aging study.

Authors:  Changhong Song; Lynn Kuo; Carol A Derby; Richard B Lipton; Charles B Hall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; William J Jagust; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Burden of Alzheimer's disease-related mortality in the United States, 1999-2008.

Authors:  Kristin Moschetti; Patricia L Cummings; Frank Sorvillo; Tony Kuo
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis in colorectal cancer using a semi-Markov model.

Authors:  Christel Castelli; Christophe Combescure; Yohann Foucher; Jean-Pierre Daures
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Mild cognitive impairment: statistical models of transition using longitudinal clinical data.

Authors:  Erin L Abner; Richard J Kryscio; Gregory E Cooper; David W Fardo; Gregory A Jicha; Marta S Mendiondo; Peter T Nelson; Charles D Smith; Linda J Van Eldik; Lijie Wan; Frederick A Schmitt
Journal:  Int J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2012-03-25
View more
  1 in total

1.  The development of a stochastic mathematical model of Alzheimer's disease to help improve the design of clinical trials of potential treatments.

Authors:  Christoforos Hadjichrysanthou; Alison K Ower; Frank de Wolf; Roy M Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.