| Literature DB >> 24223277 |
Luis Fernández1, Luis Alejandro de Haro, Ana J Distefano, Maria Carolina Martínez, Verónica Lía, Juan C Papa, Ignacio Olea, Daniela Tosto, Horacio Esteban Hopp.
Abstract
Single sequence repeats (SSR) developed for Sorghum bicolor were used to characterize the genetic distance of 46 different Sorghum halepense (Johnsongrass) accessions from Argentina some of which have evolved toward glyphosate resistance. Since Johnsongrass is an allotetraploid and only one subgenome is homologous to cultivated sorghum, some SSR loci amplified up to two alleles while others (presumably more conserved loci) amplified up to four alleles. Twelve SSR providing information of 24 loci representative of Johnsongrass genome were selected for genetic distance characterization. All of them were highly polymorphic, which was evidenced by the number of different alleles found in the samples studied, in some of them up to 20. UPGMA and Mantel analysis showed that Johnsongrass glyphosate-resistant accessions that belong to different geographic regions do not share similar genetic backgrounds. In contrast, they show closer similarity to their neighboring susceptible counterparts. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components using the clusters identified by K-means support the lack of a clear pattern of association among samples and resistance status or province of origin. Consequently, these results do not support a single genetic origin of glyphosate resistance. Nucleotide sequencing of the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) encoding gene from glyphosate-resistant and susceptible accessions collected from different geographic origins showed that none presented expected mutations in aminoacid positions 101 and 106 which are diagnostic of target-site resistance mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: EPSPS; Sorghum halepense; glyphosate; herbicide resistance; microsatellites; weed epidemiology
Year: 2013 PMID: 24223277 PMCID: PMC3797486 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Geographic distribution of the collected Johnsongrass accessions. Map of Argentina showing collection sites of Johsongrass accessions used in this study and described in Table 1. The sites are indicated by circles. Dashes delimit the different provinces.
List and place of collection of Johsongrass samples
| ID | Collection site | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAs01 | Castelar, Buenos Aires | 34°37'20.32″S | 58°39'15.08″W |
| BAs02 | Pergamino, Buenos Aires | 33°56'40.64″S | 60°36'54.44″W |
| COr01 | Río Tercero, Córdoba | 32°12'35.57″S | 64°08'42.51″W |
| COs02 | Río Tercero, Córdoba | 32°13'5.91″S | 64°08'52.01″W |
| SAr01 | Tartagal, Salta | 22°41'4.11″S | 64°02'58.73″W |
| SAr02 | Tartagal, Salta | 22°49'1.15″S | 64°02'59.54″W |
| SAr03 | Tartagal, Salta | 22°41'36.80″S | 63°37'43.23″W |
| SAr04 | Tartagal, Salta | 22°55'21.83″S | 63°38'36.40″W |
| SAr06 | Tartagal, Salta | 22°40'06.10''S | 63°47'14.80''W |
| SAs05 | Tartagal, Salta | 23°20'6.11″S | 64°13'14.19″W |
| SEr01 | Taboada, Santiago del Estero | 28° 3'53.33″S | 63°46'31.48″W |
| SEr02 | Taboada, Santiago del Estero | 28° 3'36.41″S | 63°47'40.89″W |
| SEr03 | Taboada, Santiago del Estero | 28° 5'11.02″S | 63°46'42.42″W |
| SEr04 | Taboada, Santiago del Estero | 28° 5'3.50″S | 63°48'11.80″W |
| SFr01 | Las Rosas, Santa Fe | 32°26'9.60″S | 61°34'27.32″W |
| SFr02 | Las Rosas, Santa Fe | 32°25'33.24″S | 61°35'3.93″W |
| SFr03 | Las Rosas, Santa Fe | 32°26'7.42″S | 61°36'17.41″W |
| SFr09 | Videla, Santa Fe | 30°55'3.85″S | 60°39'13.34″W |
| SFr10 | Videla, Santa Fe | 30°55'8.49″S | 60°40'1.27″W |
| SFr11 | Videla, Santa Fe | 30°55'43.72″S | 60°40'4.51″W |
| SFr12 | Videla, Santa Fe | 30°57'0.18″S | 60°36'11.71″W |
| SFr13 | El Trébol, Santa Fe | 32°13'21.71″S | 61°42'23.87″W |
| SFr14 | El Trébol, Santa Fe | 32°13'8.72″S | 61°43'32.79″W |
| SFr15 | El Trébol, Santa Fe | 32°12'15.67″S | 61°43'35.19″W |
| SFr16 | El Trébol, Santa Fe | 32°13'10.46″S | 61°42'25.39″W |
| SFs04 | Oliveros, Santa Fe | 32°32'45.17″S | 60°51'24.58″W |
| SFs05 | Oliveros, Santa Fe | 32°32'30.85″S | 60°50'49.83″W |
| SFs06 | Oliveros, Santa Fe | 32°32'0.37″S | 60°51'24.20″W |
| SFs07 | Oliveros, Santa Fe | 32°31'58.25″S | 60°52'1.19″W |
| SFs08 | Videla, Santa Fe | 30°56'26.19″S | 60°39'02.78″W |
| TUr01 | Aráoz, Tucumán | 27°02'43.40''S | 64°53'55.90''W |
| TUr02 | Aráoz, Tucumán | 27°02'41.00''S | 64°53'55.80''W |
| TUr03 | Aráoz, Tucumán | 27°02'2.36″S | 64°54'35.24″W |
| TUr06 | Aráoz, Tucumán | 27°02'41.24''S | 64°53'55.17''W |
| TUr07 | Aráoz, Tucumán | 27°01'52.65″S | 64°55'17.54″W |
| TUr08 | Aráoz, Tucumán | 27°04'52.75''S | 64°54'30.20''W |
| TUr09 | Burruyacú, Tucumán | 26°40'45.62''S | 64°37'50.59''W |
| TUr10 | Burruyacú, Tucumán | 26°23'32.89''S | 64°35'32.82''W |
| TUr11 | Burruyacú, Tucumán | 26°32'44.19''S | 64°41'01.17''W |
| TUr15 | Burruyacú, Tucumán | 26°40'45.62''S | 64°37'50.59''W |
| TUr17 | Burruyacú, Tucumán | 26°47'34.70''S | 64°40'16.00''W |
| TUs04 | EEA Obispo Colombres, Tucumán | 26°46'24.52″S | 65°12'02.86″W |
| TUs05 | Las Talitas, Tucumán | 26°47'18.20''S | 65°12'21.00''W |
| TUs12 | Burruyacú, Tucumán | 26°19'52.90''S | 64°36'55,20''W |
| TUs13 | Las Talitas, Tucumán | 26°47'18,20''S | 65°12'21.00''W |
| TUs16 | El Manantial, Tucumán | 26°51'0.11″S | 65°18'23.37″W |
Sample ID codification: the first two capital letters denote the Province origin; third letter indicates resistance (r) or susceptibility (s) to glyphosate.
Characterization of the selected single sequence repeats (SSR) markers
| Name | Primer sequences (Forward/Reverse) | Chromosome | Alleles | Alleles/plant | PIC | Ho |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACAGGGCTTTAGGGAAATCG CCATCACCGTCGGCATCT | 1 | 10 | 1.66 | 0.86 | 0.48 | |
| GCATGTGTCAGATGATCTGGTGA GCTGTTAGCTTCTTCTAATCGTCGGT | 2 | 20 | 2.65 | 0.91 | 0.93 | |
| TGATGTTGTTACCCTTCT AGCCTATGTATGTGTTCGTCC | 2 | 15 | 2.51 | 0.91 | 0.89 | |
| TGATGTTGTTACCCTTCTGG AGCCTATGTATGTGTTCGTCC | 2 | 12 | 2.46 | 0.80 | 0.89 | |
| CCAACCGCGTCGCTGATG GTGGACTCTGTCGGGGCACTG | 2 | 11 | 2.15 | 0.85 | 0.84 | |
| TAGGGAAGAGCAAGTGCAGAC AAGAAAGGGCCCAGAGTTTC | 3 | 13 | 2.31 | 0.82 | 0.89 | |
| AACCTTGCCCTATCCACCTC TATGATGAATCAAGGGAGAGG | 4 | 10 | 2.28 | 0.86 | 0.89 | |
| TCGGCGAGCATCTTACA TACGTAGGCGGTTGGATT | 5 | 5 | 1.87 | 0.60 | 0.70 | |
| AATGAGGAAAATATGAAACAAGTACCAA AATAACAAGCGCAACTATATGAACAATAAA | 5 | 9 | 2.70 | 0.80 | 0.96 | |
| AAATCATGCATCCATGTTCGTCTTC CTCCCGCTACAAGAGTACATTCATAGCTTA | 7 | 17 | 2.73 | 0.90 | 0.93 | |
| CAATGGCTTGCACATGTCCTA GGTGCGAGCTAGTTAAGTGGG | 8 | 14 | 1.77 | 0.79 | 0.62 | |
| CAATGGCTTGCACATGTC GGTGCGAGCTAGTTAAGTGGG | 9 | 16 | 2.76 | 0.90 | 0.91 | |
| Total/Average | – | – | 152 | 2.32 | 0.83 | 0.83 |
First column catalogs heterologous public SSR markers developed for S. bicolor. The adjacent sequences used for PCR primer design are depicted in the second column. Third column indicates SSR loci location. Fourth and fifth columns show the maximum number of alleles and the average number of alleles per plant in the 48 different plants analyzed in this work, respectively. The last 2 columns show PIC and observed (Ho) heterozygosis, respectively. The last row indicates the total number of alleles and the average of the upper individual values.
Figure 2UPGMA dendrogram based on Jaccard's similarity coefficient from 12 SSR marker data showing genetic relationships among the 46 Sorghum halepense samples. Accessions are codified as indicated in Table 1. External controls used are diploid S. bicolor imbred lines IS9530 and Red Land. Rectangles gray and white: samples resistant and suceptible to glyphosate, respectively. Rectangles in colors represent the geographic origin: Santa Fé, Salta, Santiago del Estero, Tucumán, Córdoba, Buenos Aires, outgroup: Sorgum bicolor.
Figure 3Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) of Sorghum halepense samples. Scatterplot of the DAPC identified by the K-means algorithm using the 20 clusters with regard to glyphosate resistance/susceptibility (A) and province of origin (B). Insets indicate the number of principal components retained for DAPC. (C) Cluster assignment according to the K-means algorithm. The represented sizes of the squares are proportional to the number of individuals in each group. Sample assignment to the 20 clusters used for DAPC analysis grouping the S. halepense samples as follows: Cluster 1: SFr11, BIC01, COs02, TUr02, SFr14, SFr12, SFr10, SFs08; Cluster 2: SFr16, SAr01, SFr01, SFs06, SFs04; Cluster 3: SFr03, SFr02; Cluster 4: TUs04; Cluster 5: SFr09; Cluster 6: SFr13, SFr15; Cluster 7: SAr03; Cluster 8:TUr06; Cluster 9: TUr09; Cluster 10: SEr04, BAs01, TUr17, SAr06, TUs12, TUr10, BAs02, SEr02; Cluster 11: TUr15; Cluster 12: COr01, TUr01; Cluster 13: TUs16; Cluster 14: SAr02, SEr01, SAr04, SAs05; Cluster 15: TUs05, TUr08, TUr11; Cluster 16: TUr03, TUr07; Cluster 17: BIC02; Cluster 18: SFs05; Cluster 19: SFs07; Cluster 20: TUs13, SEr03.