| Literature DB >> 24223270 |
Richard C Brusca1, John F Wiens, Wallace M Meyer, Jeff Eble, Kim Franklin, Jonathan T Overpeck, Wendy Moore.
Abstract
Models analyzing how Southwestern plant communities will respond to climate change predict that increases in temperature will lead to upward elevational shifts of montane species. We tested this hypothesis by reexamining Robert Whittaker's 1963 plant transect in the Santa Catalina Mountains of southern Arizona, finding that this process is already well underway. Our survey, five decades after Whittaker's, reveals large changes in the elevational ranges of common montane plants, while mean annual rainfall has decreased over the past 20 years, and mean annual temperatures increased 0.25°C/decade from 1949 to 2011 in the Tucson Basin. Although elevational changes in species are individualistic, significant overall upward movement of the lower elevation boundaries, and elevational range contractions, have occurred. This is the first documentation of significant upward shifts of lower elevation range boundaries in Southwestern montane plant species over decadal time, confirming that previous hypotheses are correct in their prediction that mountain communities in the Southwest will be strongly impacted by warming, and that the Southwest is already experiencing a rapid vegetation change.Entities:
Keywords: Southwest; climate change; elevational shifts; montane plants
Year: 2013 PMID: 24223270 PMCID: PMC3797479 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Summary of elevation range of the 27 most common upland montane plants along the Catalina Highway. White bars are 1963 elevational range data from Whittaker and Niering (1964), the two terminal (stippled) 1000-ft bands denoting Whittaker's upper- and lowermost 1000-ft vegetation bands. Black bars represent 2011 elevation data from this study. To be as conservative as possible, a change in a species elevation limit (high or low) was noted only if that species was found outside (above or below) the upper- or lowermost 1000-ft band. Thus, if anything, we underestimate the elevational change in the species since 1963 (see Materials and Methods). Following this protocol, 15 species show an unambiguous increase in lower elevation, four show an increase in upper elevation, and eight show a decrease in upper elevation.
Summary of 27 plant species analyzed, showing changes in lower elevation boundary, upper elevation boundary, and overall range contraction/expansion since 1963. Positive numbers indicate elevation increase (or overall range increase) and negative numbers indicate elevation decrease (or overall range contraction). Elevations are presented in feet to more easily compare them to the original Whittaker and Niering (1) data
| Biogeographic affinity | Elevation range (2011) | Lower elevation change (since 1963) | Upper elevation change (since 1963) | Overall elevation range contraction (since 1963) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 5028–7162 ft (1533–2183 m) | 1028 | 0 | −1028 | |
| S | 6962–9111 ft (2122–2777 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| N | 6962–9111 ft (2122–2777 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| S | 4893–8081 ft (1491–2463 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| S | 4539–6309 ft (1383–1923 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| N | 7828–8412 ft (2386–2564 m) | 828 | 0 | −828 | |
| S | 5915–8081 ft (1803–2463 m) | −85 | 0 | 85 | |
| N | 6732–8412 ft (2052–2564 m) | 0 | 0 | ||
| ? | 4539–7434 ft (1383–2266 m) | 0 | 434 | 434 | |
| N | 5915–8081 ft (1803–2463 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| S | 4539–6660 ft (1383–2030 m) | 0 | −340 | −340 | |
| S | 3801–4893 ft (1159–1491 m) | 801 | −1107 | −1908 | |
| N | 7625–8488 ft (2324–2587 m) | 625 | 0 | −625 | |
| N | 4539–6732 ft (1383–2052 m) | 539 | −268 | −807 | |
| S | 4893–7946 ft (1491–2422 m) | 893 | 1946 | 1053 | |
| N | 7297–8829 ft (2224–2691 m) | 297 | 0 | −297 | |
| N | 7162–8028 ft (2183–2447 m) | 2162 | 0 | −2162 | |
| N | 7477–9111 ft (2279–2777 m) | 1477 | 0 | −1477 | |
| S | 3801–5028 ft (1159–1533 m) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| S | 4539–6732 ft (1383–2052 m) | 539 | 0 | −539 | |
| S | 4539–6732 ft (1383–2052 m) | 539 | −268 | −807 | |
| S | 4539–6660 ft (1383–2030 m) | 0 | −340 | −340 | |
| S | 3801–6732 ft (1159–2052 m) | 801 | 732 | −69 | |
| ? | 3717–5028 ft (1133–1533 m) | 0 | −972 | −972 | |
| S | 4539–7434 ft (1383–2266 m) | 539 | −566 | −1105 | |
| S | 3428–3845 ft (1045–1172 m) | 428 | −1165 | −1593 | |
| S | 3806–4893 ft (1160–1491 m) | 806 | 893 | 87 |
N = Northern biogeographic connection (i.e., temperate/Petran). S = Southern biogeographic connection (i.e., tropical/subtropical/Madrean/Tropical Deciduous Forest/Sinaloan Thorn forest). ? = Biogeographic relationship unclear.
Figure 2Mean annual air temperatures and rainfall in Tucson, 1949–2011. Dashed lines indicate 63-year means. Data from U.S. National Weather Service, Tucson, WPO-AP.
Figure 3Today, the first alligator junipers (Juniperus deppeana var. deppeana) along the upland slopes of the Catalina Highway make their appearance at approximately 5000 ft. Fifty years ago, Whittaker and Niering (1964) reported this species from desert and desert grassland at 3000 to 4000 ft.