Literature DB >> 24222927

A Phase I Bayesian Adaptive Design to Simultaneously Optimize Dose and Schedule Assignments Both Between and Within Patients.

Jin Zhang1, Thomas M Braun.   

Abstract

In traditional schedule or dose-schedule finding designs, patients are assumed to receive their assigned dose-schedule combination throughout the trial even though the combination may be found to have an undesirable toxicity profile, which contradicts actual clinical practice. Since no systematic approach exists to optimize intra-patient dose-schedule assignment, we propose a Phase I clinical trial design that extends existing approaches to optimize dose and schedule solely between patients by incorporating adaptive variations to dose-schedule assignments within patients as the study proceeds. Our design is based on a Bayesian non-mixture cure rate model that incorporates multiple administrations each patient receives with the per-administration dose included as a covariate. Simulations demonstrate that our design identifies safe dose and schedule combinations as well as the traditional method that does not allow for intra-patient dose-schedule reassignments, but with a larger number of patients assigned to safe combinations. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian statistics; Clinical trial; Dose-escalation study; Dynamic treatment regime; Non-mixture cure model

Year:  2013        PMID: 24222927      PMCID: PMC3821780          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.806927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  10 in total

1.  Estimating Cure Rates From Survival Data: An Alternative to Two-Component Mixture Models.

Authors:  A D Tsodikov; J G Ibrahim; A Y Yakovlev
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks.

Authors:  A Tsiatis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Maintenance therapy with low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for recurrent acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a dose and schedule finding study.

Authors:  Marcos de Lima; Sergio Giralt; Peter F Thall; Leandro de Padua Silva; Roy B Jones; Krishna Komanduri; Thomas M Braun; Hoang Q Nguyen; Richard Champlin; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Parametric non-mixture cure models for schedule finding of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Changying A Liu; Thomas M Braun
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.864

6.  Determining a maximum-tolerated schedule of a cytotoxic agent.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Zheng Yuan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Generalizing the TITE-CRM to adapt for early- and late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Peter F Thall; Hoang Nguyen; Marcos de Lima
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Adaptive Phase I clinical trial design using Markov models for conditional probability of toxicity.

Authors:  Laura L Fernandes; Jeremy M G Taylor; Susan Murray
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  An adaptive trial design to optimize dose-schedule regimes with delayed outcomes.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Adaptive Phase 1 Design in Radiation Therapy Trials.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Thomas M Braun; Daniel P Normolle; Matthew J Schipper
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 8.013

4.  Bayesian Dose-Finding in Two Treatment Cycles Based on the Joint Utility of Efficacy and Toxicity.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Yuan Ji; Peter Müller
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Bayesian dose regimen assessment in early phase oncology incorporating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Emma Gerard; Sarah Zohar; Hoai-Thu Thai; Christelle Lorenzato; Marie-Karelle Riviere; Moreno Ursino
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 1.701

6.  Bayesian modeling of a bivariate toxicity outcome for early phase oncology trials evaluating dose regimens.

Authors:  Emma Gerard; Sarah Zohar; Christelle Lorenzato; Moreno Ursino; Marie-Karelle Riviere
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Population Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Epoetin Alfa in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Maintenance Treatment Using Bayesian Approach.

Authors:  Ly Minh Nguyen; Calvin J Meaney; Gauri G Rao; Mandip Panesar; Wojciech Krzyzanski
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.