Literature DB >> 24222828

Diagnosis and outcome in a prehospital cohort of patients with bundle branch block and suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Jacob Thorsted Sørensen1, Carsten Stengaard, Christina Ankjær Sørensen, Kristian Thygesen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Leif Thuesen, Christian Juhl Terkelsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immediate revascularization is beneficial in patients with presumed new-onset bundle branch block myocardial infarction (BBBMI). In the prehospital setting, it is a challenge to diagnose new-onset BBBMI and triage accordingly.
METHODS: ECG, final diagnosis, and mortality were assessed in a prehospital cohort of 4905 consecutive patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Bundle branch block (BBB) was defined as QRS duration ≥120 ms caused by delayed intraventricular conduction. Mortality and angiography data were obtained from the Central Office of Civil Registration and the Western Denmark Heart Registry. Definite diagnosis of AMI and the onset of BBB were determined by expert consensus. Patients were divided into four groups: with or without AMI and with or without BBB. Mortality was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier plots and compared using log-rank statistics.
RESULTS: AMI was diagnosed in 954 patients, of whom 118 had BBB. In 3951 patients without AMI, 436 had BBB. Patients with BBBMI were less often revascularized than patients with AMI without BBB (24 vs. 54%, p<0.001). BBBMI was categorized as new onset in 43 patients of whom two were triaged for acute angioplasty. One-year mortality was 47.2, 17.5, 20.8, and 8.6% (log-rank <0.001) in patients with BBBMI, patients with AMI without BBB, patients with BBB without AMI, and patients without AMI or BBB, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BBBMI have a high mortality. Less than 25% undergo revascularization and only very few patients with new-onset BBBMI are transferred for urgent revascularization. Focus on improving triage and prehospital identification of high-risk patients with BBB and chest pain could improve outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; bundle branch block; prehospital diagnosis; primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24222828      PMCID: PMC3821808          DOI: 10.1177/2048872613483591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care        ISSN: 2048-8726


  16 in total

1.  Elevation of biochemical markers for myocardial damage prior to hospital admission in patients with acute chest pain or other symptoms raising suspicion of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  L Svensson; C Axelsson; R Nordlander; J Herlitz
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort.

Authors:  Christian Juhl Terkelsen; Jens Flensted Lassen; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard; Jens Christian Gerdes; Tage Jensen; Liv Bjørn-Hansen Gøtzsche; Torsten Toftegaard Nielsen; Henning Rud Andersen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Frederick G Kushner; Mary Hand; Sidney C Smith; Spencer B King; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Steven R Bailey; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Donald E Casey; Lee A Green; Judith S Hochman; Alice K Jacobs; Harlan M Krumholz; Douglass A Morrison; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Eric D Peterson; Michael A Sloan; Patrick L Whitlow; David O Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Incidence and clinical relevance of the occurrence of bundle-branch block in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy.

Authors:  K H Newby; E Pisanó; M W Krucoff; C Green; A Natale
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sonia Jain; Henry T Ting; Malcolm Bell; Christine M Bjerke; Ryan J Lennon; Bernard J Gersh; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial.

Authors:  Cheuk-Kit Wong; Ralph A H Stewart; Wanzhen Gao; John K French; Christopher Raffel; Harvey D White
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators.

Authors:  E B Sgarbossa; S L Pinski; A Barbagelata; D A Underwood; K B Gates; E J Topol; R M Califf; G S Wagner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Extent of the decrease of 28-day case fatality of hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction over 22 years: epidemiological versus clinical view: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg infarction registry.

Authors:  Bernhard Kuch; Wolfgang von Scheidt; Anja Ehmann; Birgitt Kling; Claudia Greschik; Allmut Hoermann; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-06-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of rescue and primary percutaneous coronary interventions for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M B Faslur Rahuman; Jayanthimala B Jayawardena; George R Francis; Niraj Mahboob; Wasantha Kumara A H T; Aruna Wijesinghe; Rashan Haniffa; Ranithrie Ariyapperuma; Abbyramy Paramanayakam; Pubudu A De Silva
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-03-06

2.  New permanent bundle-branch block and long-term prognosis of patients with new onset ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Jun Wang; Bing Wu; Yanan Xu; Long Tang; Haibing Jiang; Benfang Wang; Tongjian Zhu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Clinical characteristics and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis of different subtypes of bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Tongjian Zhu; Mingxian Chen; Wei Hu; Benfang Wang; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 1.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.