Literature DB >> 24222735

Wet chemical controllable synthesis of hematite ellipsoids with structurally enhanced visible light property.

Chengliang Han1, Jie Han, Qiankun Li, Jingsong Xie.   

Abstract

A facile and economic route has been presented for mass production of micro/nanostructured hematite microcrystals based on the wet chemical controllable method. The as-prepared samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy. The results showed that the product was mesoporous α -Fe2O3 and nearly elliptical in shape. Each hematite ellipsoid was packed by many α -Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The values of vapor pressure in reaction systems played vital roles in the formation of porous hematite ellipsoids. Optical tests demonstrated that the micro/nanostructured elliptical hematite exhibited enhanced visible light property at room temperature. The formation of these porous hematite ellipsoids could be attributed to the vapor pressure induced oriented assembling of lots of α -Fe2O3 nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24222735      PMCID: PMC3814095          DOI: 10.1155/2013/410594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal        ISSN: 1537-744X


1. Introduction

Hematite (α-Fe2O3) is the oldest known iron oxide mineral and is widely applied in catalysts, gas sensors, pigments, and promising photoanodes for solar cells [1-4]. Over the past ten years, various hematite nanostructures with a well-defined shape such as nanorods [5], nanowires [6], and nanobelts [7] have been obtained successfully by directional growth techniques [8-10], template guiding [11, 12], and decomposition of shape-regular iron precursors [13, 14]. However, the previous reported shape-controllable synthetic methods have some limitations. For example, the used shape-controlling reagents such as some templates and surfactants are usually more expensive and hard to wash out. Additionally, solid reaction processes for α-Fe2O3 may introduce some other iron oxide phases and release harmful gases for possible environmental pollution. Consequently, developing simple and economic methods for preparation of hematite nanomaterials as well as the modification of their sizes, morphology, and porosity has been intensively pursued not only for their fundamental scientific interest but also for many technological applications. This work presents a new method to produce large-scale α-Fe2O3 micro/nanostructured porous ellipsoids. The size and shape of as-prepared α-Fe2O3 can be well controlled only by simply regulating the values of vapor pressure in reaction systems. The results reported in this paper mainly encompass the formation mechanism of porous α-Fe2O3 with different morphologies and their corresponding visible light properties at room temperature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of the Samples

The micro/nanostructured hematites were prepared as follows. Firstly, the Fe(OH)3 precursors were precipitated from FeCl3 ·6H2O solution by adding proper ammonia (NH3 ·H2O). And the above Fe(OH)3 with the solution was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon autoclave with a pressure gage for detecting internal vapor pressure. Then, the above sealed Teflon autoclave was heated to 453 K, and the internal vapor pressure was kept under 1.45 × 105 Pa for 2 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the bright red powder was ultrasonically rinsed for several times in deionized water and ethanol, respectively. Finally, the sample was collected by a centrifuge and dried in a vacuum oven at 353 K for 6 h.

2.2. Characterization of the Samples

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Philips X'pert diffractometer using CuK radiation (λ = 1.5419 Å). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was recorded on a Sirion 200 FEI field emission scanning electron microscope. The transmission electron microscopic (TEM) micrographs were taken with a JEOL-2010 field emission transmission electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The UV-Vis absorption spectra were taken on a spectrophotometer (Cary 5E UV-Vis-NIR) from 200 to 1200 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD and Morphology of As-Prepared Samples

After Fe(OH)3 precursors in solution were heated at 453 K for 2 h in Teflon autoclave with the internal vapor 1.45 × 105 Pa or so, the red powders were collected by a centrifuge. The corresponding X-ray diffraction (XRD) was illustrated in Figure 1. It can be found that all the diffraction peaks can be indexed to pure α-Fe2O3 (JCPDS NO. 89-2810). The intense peaks of the XRD pattern indicate that the as-prepared powders were well-crystallized α-Fe2O3.
Figure 1

XRD patterns of the as-synthesized sample and standard α-Fe2O3 powder (the line spectrum).

FE-SEM observations have shown that each as-prepared α-Fe2O3 particle is of collective-like morphology with nearly elliptical in shape and nanoscaled surface roughness, as illustrated in Figure 2(a) and its inset. Each hematite ellipsoid is 500 nm and 120 nm in major and short axis, respectively (seen from Figure 2(a)). Further microstructural examination conducted for such α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids was shown in Figure 2(b). It was confirmed that many α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles (~20 nm) reconstructed the porous hematite ellipsoid. The surface of every ellipsoid is also thus rough.
Figure 2

Microstructural examination of α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids. (a) Low-magnification SEM image; (b) low-magnification TEM image (insets: corresponding high-magnification).

In general, the values of pressure in reaction systems will determine the chemical reaction start at the same reaction temperature. So different composition products can be gained under different values of pressures. Our deep and systematic studies have revealed that pure goethite (α-FeOOH) nanorods (seen from Figures 3(a) and 4(a)) will be obtained when the value of reactive pressure is less than 1.02 × 105 Pa. And the mixture of α-FeOOH nanorods and α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids will be acquired when the value of pressure is between 1.15 × 105 Pa and 1.45 × 105 Pa, as shown in Figures 3(b) and 4(b), respectively.
Figure 3

XRD patterns of samples under different pressures ((a) 1.02 × 105 Pa (b) 1.15 × 105 Pa (c) 1.62 × 105 Pa).

Figure 4

Morphology of samples at different pressures ((a) 1.02 × 105 Pa, (b) 1.15 × 105 Pa, and (c) 1.62 × 105 Pa).

3.2. Effect of Vapor Pressure

When the value of pressure is next to 1.62 × 105 Pa or higher, pure α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals will be achieved (seen from Figure 3(c)). Hence, a lower value of reactive pressure was not beneficial to the formation of α-Fe2O3. However, higher value of pressure will lead to lots of homogeneous α-Fe2O3 solid quasicubic particles (seen from Figure 4(c)) instead of the porous α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids, as illustrated in Figure 2. Therefore, it can be concluded that the values of vapor pressure in reaction systems will influence not only the composition of the products but also the morphologies.

3.3. Formation of Porous α-Fe2O3 Ellipsoids

The formation process of α-Fe2O3 porous ellipsoids could be described in the following three stages. First of all, the Fe(OH)3 precursors would be formed by the precipitation between Fe3+ and OH− at room temperature (1). With subsequent heating at 453 K, the Fe(OH)3 will begin to decompose into α-FeOOH (2), which is finally dehydrated to α-Fe2O3 molecules (3). Secondly, when the concentration of α-Fe2O3 molecules was supersaturated, ultrafine α-Fe2O3 particles would be formed in the solution by nucleation and growth: Finally, the as-formed hematite nanoparticles would be further coarsened by an oriented-assembling mode in order to reduce the surface energy of α-Fe2O3 particles which were polar crystals and tended to spontaneously assemble [15, 16]. The proper value of vapor pressure will help α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals migrate and readjust more easily in a reactor. As a result, with the assemble going on, the porous hematite ellipsoid packed with many α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles would be formed. The above three stages have been illustrated in Figure 5. We acknowledge that the true formation mechanism of porous α-Fe2O3 elliptical structures is still unclear. However, it is obvious that the values of vapor pressure in a reactor are of great importance in the growth of porous α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids.
Figure 5

Schematic illustration for formation of porous α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids.

3.4. Ultraviolet Visible Optical Properties

The optical absorption measurement of as-prepared α-Fe2O3 products was conducted at room temperature, which may help the understanding of the electronic structure and size effect. Figure 6(a) shows the optical absorption spectrum of the quasicubic α-Fe2O3 nanostructures, and the optical absorption feature was observed at wavelength around 390 nm (3.18 eV) and had an inflection and shift to the short wavelength compared to that reported by Li et al. [17]. Figure 6(b) shows the optical absorption spectrum of the ellipsoid-like micro/nanostructured α-Fe2O3, and the absorption peak is about 590 nm (2.10 eV). The different optical adsorption properties of two different shaped α-Fe2O3 can be attributed to their different structures. In a word, the as-obtained porous α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids were extended for potential application in photodegradating pollutants under visible light. The relative studies are our next work.
Figure 6

UV-Vis spectrums of α-Fe2O3 from various pressures: (a) 1.62 × 105 Pa; (b) 1.45 × 105 Pa.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have demonstrated mass production of micro/nanostructured elliptical hematite by a wet chemical pressure-controlled method. Our investigations have showed that the values of vapor pressure in reaction systems have been considered to play vital roles in the formation of porous α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids. The vapor pressure induced oriented assembling mechanism of polar hematite nanocrystals has been inferred. Importantly, the micro/nanostructured porous α-Fe2O3 ellipsoids with excellent visible light property can be used as a novel potential photocatalyst for removal of some toxic chemicals.
  10 in total

1.  Single-crystalline iron oxide nanotubes.

Authors:  Chun-Jiang Jia; Ling-Dong Sun; Zheng-Guang Yan; Li-Ping You; Feng Luo; Xiao-Dong Han; Yu-Cheng Pang; Ze Zhang; Chun-Hua Yan
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Preparation of akaganeite nanorods and their transformation to sphere shape hematite.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Jianhua Jiang; Xiaoming Zhou; Guowang Diao
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-08

3.  Shape-controlled synthesis and catalytic application of ceria nanomaterials.

Authors:  Dengsong Zhang; Xianjun Du; Liyi Shi; Ruihua Gao
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Facile solution synthesis of α-FeF3·3H2O nanowires and their conversion to α-Fe2O3 nanowires for photoelectrochemical application.

Authors:  Linsen Li; Yanghai Yu; Fei Meng; Yizheng Tan; Robert J Hamers; Song Jin
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Surfactant-assisted synthesis of alpha-Fe2O3 nanotubes and nanorods with shape-dependent magnetic properties.

Authors:  Lu Liu; Hui-Zhong Kou; Wenling Mo; Huajie Liu; Yuqiu Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Influence of plasmonic Au nanoparticles on the photoactivity of Fe₂O₃ electrodes for water splitting.

Authors:  Elijah Thimsen; Florian Le Formal; Michael Grätzel; Scott C Warren
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Bicrystalline hematite nanowires.

Authors:  Rongming Wang; Yaofeng Chen; Yunyi Fu; Han Zhang; Christian Kisielowski
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Controlled growth of large-area, uniform, vertically aligned arrays of alpha-Fe2O3 nanobelts and nanowires.

Authors:  Xiaogang Wen; Suhua Wang; Yong Ding; Zhong Lin Wang; Shihe Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Synthesis of hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) nanorods: diameter-size and shape effects on their applications in magnetism, lithium ion battery, and gas sensors.

Authors:  Changzheng Wu; Ping Yin; Xi Zhu; Chuanzi OuYang; Yi Xie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Sn-doped hematite nanostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting.

Authors:  Yichuan Ling; Gongming Wang; Damon A Wheeler; Jin Z Zhang; Yat Li
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 11.189

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.