Kate M Silvester1, Mohammed A Mohammed2, Paul Harriman3, Anna Girolami3, Tom W Downes4. 1. Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, Warwick, Warwickshire, UK University of Warwick, Warwick, Warwickshire, UK. 2. School of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK. 3. Service Improvement, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK. 4. Geriatric Medicine Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: hospitals are under pressure to reduce waiting times and costs. One strategy that may be effective focuses on optimising the flow of emergency patients. OBJECTIVE: we undertook a patient flow analysis of older emergency patients to identify and address delays in ensuring timely care, without additional resources. DESIGN: prospective systems redesign study over 2 years. SETTING: the Geriatric Medicine Directorate in an acute hospital (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) with 1920 beds. SUBJECTS: older patients admitted as emergencies. METHODS: diagnostic patient flow analysis followed by a series of Plan Do Study Act cycles to test and implement changes by a multidisciplinary team using time series run charts. RESULTS: 60% of patients aged 75+ years arrived in the Emergency Department during office hours, but two-thirds of the admissions to GM wards were outside office hours highlighting a major delay. Three changes were undertaken to address this, Discharge to Assess, Seven Day Working and the establishment of a Frailty Unit. Average bed occupancy fell by 20.4 beds (95% confidence interval (CI) -39.6 to -1.2, P = 0.037) for similar demand. The risk of hospital mortality also fell by 2.25% (before 11.4% (95% CI 10.4-12.4%), after 9.15% (95% CI 7.6-10.7%) which equates to a number needed to treat of 45 and a 19.7% reduction in relative risk of mortality. The risk of re-admission remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: redesigning the system of care for older emergency patients led to reductions in bed occupancy and mortality without affecting re-admission rates or requiring additional resources.
BACKGROUND: hospitals are under pressure to reduce waiting times and costs. One strategy that may be effective focuses on optimising the flow of emergency patients. OBJECTIVE: we undertook a patient flow analysis of older emergency patients to identify and address delays in ensuring timely care, without additional resources. DESIGN: prospective systems redesign study over 2 years. SETTING: the Geriatric Medicine Directorate in an acute hospital (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) with 1920 beds. SUBJECTS: older patients admitted as emergencies. METHODS: diagnostic patient flow analysis followed by a series of Plan Do Study Act cycles to test and implement changes by a multidisciplinary team using time series run charts. RESULTS: 60% of patients aged 75+ years arrived in the Emergency Department during office hours, but two-thirds of the admissions to GM wards were outside office hours highlighting a major delay. Three changes were undertaken to address this, Discharge to Assess, Seven Day Working and the establishment of a Frailty Unit. Average bed occupancy fell by 20.4 beds (95% confidence interval (CI) -39.6 to -1.2, P = 0.037) for similar demand. The risk of hospital mortality also fell by 2.25% (before 11.4% (95% CI 10.4-12.4%), after 9.15% (95% CI 7.6-10.7%) which equates to a number needed to treat of 45 and a 19.7% reduction in relative risk of mortality. The risk of re-admission remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: redesigning the system of care for older emergency patients led to reductions in bed occupancy and mortality without affecting re-admission rates or requiring additional resources.
Authors: Jurre Blaauw; Bram Jacobs; Heleen M den Hertog; Niels A van der Gaag; Korné Jellema; Ruben Dammers; Kuan H Kho; Rob J M Groen; Joukje van der Naalt; Hester F Lingsma Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Éidín Ní Shé; Fiona Keogan; Eilish McAuliffe; Diarmuid O'Shea; Mary McCarthy; Rosa McNamara; Marie Therese Cooney Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kate Honeyford; Graham S Cooke; Anne Kinderlerer; Elizabeth Williamson; Mark Gilchrist; Alison Holmes; Ben Glampson; Abdulrahim Mulla; Ceire Costelloe Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Gail Hayward; Sharon Dixon; Sophie Garland; Margaret Glogowska; Helen Hunt; Daniel Lasserson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 2.692