Literature DB >> 24222344

FaceTime(®) for teaching ultrasound-guided anesthetic procedures in remote place.

Tetsuya Miyashita1, Yasuhiro Iketani, Yusuke Nagamine, Takahisa Goto.   

Abstract

In isolated area in Japan, only one anesthesiologist must often do new anesthetic techniques such as ultrasound-guided procedures without receiving any teaching. One solution to this problem may involve teleanesthesia, by which experienced anesthesiologists teach novices in remote places, by utilizing information communication technologies. FaceTime™ (Apple, USA), which provides 120p of the resolution and 30 frames per second (fps) is an application of free visual communications using iPod Touch™, iPhone™ or iPad™ (Apple, USA). We investigated the delay time, the loss of the frames and the picture quality of iPad (as the device in the teaching site) in combination with iPod Touch, iPhone4 or iPhone5 (as the device in the isolated site) during FaceTime. At the operating rooms in Sado General Hospital (SGH) located in Sado Island (population; approximately 60,000), Japan, an anesthesiologist prepared 3 mobile devices (iPod Touch, iPhone4 or iPhone5). He called the other anesthesiologist at Yokohama City University Hospital (YCUH; approximately 300 km apart) by FaceTime using 1 of 3 mobile devices. The anesthesiologist at YCUH received the FaceTime call using iPad. After the connection was established, the display of the same cervical ultrasound image at SGH was sent to YCUH to evaluate the distinctness visually. Then we measured the delay time of every second (n = 60) and the loss of the frames (total frames = 30 fps × 60 s = 1,800) in each device for a minute. P < 0.01 was statistically significant. The quality of the pictures on the iPad display sent from iPhone5 was distinctly the best visually. The delay time of iPhone5 was significantly longer than the others (iPod Touch; 0.14 ± 0.02 s, iPhone4; 0.13 ± 0.02 s, iPhone5; 0.19 ± 0.03 s), but clinically acceptable. The loss of the frames of iPhone5 (20; 1.1%) was significantly less than the others (iPhone4; 900, 50.0%, iPod Touch; 902, 50.1%). To teach anesthetic techniques in remote place by FaceTime, iPhone5 as the devise in isolate site was optimum compared with iPod Touch and iPhone4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24222344     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9514-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  11 in total

1.  Case report of remote anesthetic monitoring using telemedicine.

Authors:  Stephen W Cone; Lynne Gehr; Russell Hummel; Azhar Rafiq; Charles R Doarn; Ronald C Merrell
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  Complications of regional anesthesia: nerve injury and peripheral neural blockade.

Authors:  Gregory A Liguori
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.956

3.  Camera phone as the medium.

Authors:  J Lance Lichtor
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Neurological complication analysis of 1000 ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks for elective orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  M J Fredrickson; D H Kilfoyle
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 5.  Telemedicine in anesthesia: an update.

Authors:  Jorge A Galvez; Mohamed A Rehman
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.706

6.  Fetal telemedicine: interactive transfer of realtime ultrasound and video via ISDN for remote consultation.

Authors:  N M Fisk; S Bower; W Sepulveda; P Garner; K Cameron; M Matthews; D Ridley; K Drysdale; R Wootton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 6.184

7.  Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service.

Authors:  Yves Auroy; Dan Benhamou; Laurent Bargues; Claude Ecoffey; Bruno Falissard; Frédéric J Mercier; Hervé Bouaziz; Kamran Samii; Frédéric Mercier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Using an Apple iPad(™) to assist fibreoptic intubation.

Authors:  D Low; M Goos
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Real-time radiologist review of remote ultrasound using low-cost video and voice.

Authors:  D V Beard; B M Hemminger; B Keefe; C Mittelstaedt; E D Pisano; J K Lee
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Telemedicine consultation and monitoring for pediatric liver transplant.

Authors:  John Fiadjoe; Harshad Gurnaney; Kanchi Muralidhar; Surya Mohanty; John Kumar; Raja Viswanath; Srinivas Sonar; Stephen Dunn; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  4 in total

1.  Video chat technology to remotely quantify dietary, supplement and medication adherence in clinical trials.

Authors:  Courtney M Peterson; John W Apolzan; Courtney Wright; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education.

Authors:  Michel Laks; Carla Morales Guerra; João Luiz Miraglia; Eduardo Alexandrino Medeiros
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Virtual Read-Out: Radiology Education for the 21st Century During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Charles H Li; Anandh G Rajamohan; Patricia T Acharya; Chia-Shang J Liu; Vishal Patel; John L Go; Paul E Kim; Jay Acharya
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Feasibility Evaluation of Commercially Available Video Conferencing Devices to Technically Direct Untrained Nonmedical Personnel to Perform a Rapid Trauma Ultrasound Examination.

Authors:  Davinder Ramsingh; Michael Ma; Danny Quy Le; Warren Davis; Mark Ringer; Briahnna Austin; Cameron Ricks
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.