| Literature DB >> 24221887 |
Jacek Karamon1, Maciej Kochanowski, Jacek Sroka, Tomasz Cencek, Mirosław Różycki, Ewa Chmurzyńska, Ewa Bilska-Zając.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Poland. Overall, 1,546 intestinal samples from 15 of the 16 provinces in Poland were examined by the sedimentation and counting technique (SCT). The mean prevalence of E. multilocularis in Poland was 16.5% and was found in 14 of the 15 examined provinces. The mean intensity of infection was 2,807 tapeworms per intestine. Distinct differences in prevalence were observed between regions. In some provinces of eastern and southern Poland, the level of prevalence was 50.0% (Warmińsko-Mazurskie), 47.2% (Podkarpackie), 30.4% (Podlaskie) and 28.6% (Małopolskie), while in other provinces (west and south-west), only a few percent was found: 2.0% (Dolnośląskie), 2.5% (Wielkopolskie) and 0.0% (in Opolskie). The border between areas with higher and lower prevalence seems to coincide with a north-south line running through the middle of Poland, with prevalence from 17.5 to 50.0% in the eastern half and from 0.0 to 11.8% in the western half. The dynamic situation observed in the prevalence of this tapeworm indicated the necessity of continuing to monitor the situation concerning E. multilocularis in red foxes in Poland.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24221887 PMCID: PMC3898514 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-013-3657-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Prevalence and intensity of E. multilocularis in red foxes in Poland
| Provinces | No. of examined foxes | % of positive foxes (95 % CI) | Mean no. of worms per intestine (CV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dolnośląskie (DS) | 102 | 2.0 (0.3–7.6) | 410 (117 %) |
| Kujawsko-Pomorskie (KP) | 103 | 3.9 (1.5–9.6) | 1,685 (197 %) |
| Łódzkie (LD) | 104 | 5.8 (2.7–12.0) | 3,187 (233 %) |
| Małopolskie (MP) | 98 | 28.6 (20.6–38.2) | 216 (168 %) |
| Mazowieckie (MZ) | 120 | 30.8 (23.3–39.6) | 2,253 (367 %) |
| Lubuskie (LB) | 107 | 4.7 (2.0–10.5) | 1,610 (160 %) |
| Opolskie (OP) | 100 | 0.0 (0.0–3.7) | 0 |
| Podkarpackie (PK) | 106 | 47.2 (37.9–56.6) | 8,704 (459 %) |
| Podlaskie (PD) | 100 | 34.0 (25.5–43.7) | 2,219 (285 %) |
| Pomorskie (PM) | 100 | 3.0 (1.0–8.5) | 359 (155 %) |
| Śląskie (SL) | 102 | 11.8 (6.9–19.4) | 513 (172 %) |
| Świętokrzyskie (SW) | 97 | 17.5 (11.2–26.3) | 736 (197 %) |
| Warmińsko-Mazurskie (WM) | 98 | 50.0 (40.3–59.7) | 1,222 (234 %) |
| Wielkopolskie (WP) | 119 | 2.5 (0.9–7.6) | 15 (83 %) |
| Zachodniopomorskie (ZP) | 90 | 5.6 (2.4–12.4) | 256 (180 %) |
| Total | 1,546 | 16.5 (14.7–18.4) | 2,807 (656 %) |
Fig. 1Prevalence of E. multilocularis in Poland. Gray-coloured provinces were included in the investigation described in this paper. DS Dolnośląskie, KP Kujawsko-Pomorskie, LD Łódzkie, MP Małopolskie, LB Lubuskie, LU Lubelskie, MZ Mazowieckie, OP Opolskie, PK Podkarpackie, PD Podlaskie, PM Pomorskie, SL Śląskie, SW Świętokrzyskie, WM Warmińsko-Mazurskie, WP Wielkopolskie, ZP Zachodniopomorskie. Asterisk indicates results from 2007 to 2008 (Karamon et al. 2011)
Comparison of previous and current prevalence of E. multilocularis in red foxes in selected provinces of Poland
| Provinces | % of | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995–2000a | 2001–2006b | 2007–2008c | 2009–2013 | |
| Małopolskie (MP) | 0.6 (0.1–3.5) | 20.1 (15.3–26.0) | – | 28.6 (20.6–38.2) |
| Mazowieckie (MZ) | – | 13.5 (10.6–17.6) | – | 30.8 (23.3–39.6) |
| Podkarpackie (PK) | 7.2 (4.0–12.8) | 36.8 (32.2–41.5) | – | 47.2 (37.9–56.6) |
| Podlaskie (PD) | 6.5 (3.0–13.5) | – | – | 34.0 (25.5–43.7) |
| Świętokrzyskie (SW) | – | – | 3.6 (1.4–8.9) | 17.5 (11.2–26.3) |
| Warmińsko-Mazurskie (WM) | 18.8 (13.6–25.4) | 39.6 (34.9–44.8) | – | 50.0 (40.3–59.7) |
| Lubelskie (LU) | 1.0 (0.2–5.5) | – | 18.2 (13.8–23.5) | – |
| Dolnośląskie (DS) | 0.0 (0.0–1.2) | 1.0 (0.2–5.5) | – | 2.0 (0.3–7.6) |
| Kujawsko-Pomorskie (KP) | 0.6 (0.1–3.3) | – | – | 3.9 (1.5–9.6) |
| Lubuskie (LB) | 1.2 (0.8–1.8) | – | – | 4.7 (2.0–10.5) |
| Pomorskie (PM) | 7.3 (4.9–10.2) | 7.9 (6.2–10.1) | – | 3.0 (1.0–8.5) |
| Zachodniopomorskie (ZP) | 1.2 (0.6–2.4) | – | – | 5.6 (2.4–12.4) |
aMachnicka-Rowińska et al. (2002); Malczewski et al. (2008b); Ramisz et al. (1997); Rocki et al. (1999)
bBorecka et al. (2007, 2008); Pacoń et al. (2006)
cKaramon et al. (2011)
Fig. 2Comparison of E. multilocularis prevalence in red foxes with density of fox population, forest cover and agricultural land. Single asterisk indicates data from the Polish Hunting Association Report (2011/2012). Double asterisks indicate data from the Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland 2013