Literature DB >> 24220841

Potential biases in site and species selection for ecological monitoring.

M W Palmer1.   

Abstract

A number of the contributions to this workshop (particularly in the session on biodiversity and population monitoring) have stressed the importance of choosing appropriate species and locations for ecological monitoring. This is of pragmatic necessity: it is impossible to monitor all species at all locations. The purpose of this note is to caution against some possible pitfalls in the selection of species and sites. These pitfalls are a result of the statistical concept of regression.

Year:  1993        PMID: 24220841     DOI: 10.1007/BF00547504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  3 in total

1.  Towards a long-term integrated monitoring programme in Europe: network design in theory and practice.

Authors:  T W Parr; M Ferretti; I C Simpson; M Forsius; E Kovács-Láng
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Attributes of reliable long-term landscape-scale studies: Malpractice insurance for landscape ecologists.

Authors:  T J Stohlgren; D Binkley; T T Veblen; W L Baker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  On developing bioindicators for human and ecological health.

Authors:  J Burger; M Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.513

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.