Literature DB >> 24220825

The good, the bad and the ugly of monitoring programs: Defining questions and establishing objectives.

B B Stout1.   

Abstract

Year:  1993        PMID： 24220825     DOI： 10.1007/BF00547488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN： 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  The role of metadata and strategies to detect and control temporal data bias in environmental monitoring of soil contamination.

Authors:  André Desaules
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Selecting species for marine assessment of radionuclides around Amchitka: planning for diverse goals and interests.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Stephen Jewett
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Attributes of reliable long-term landscape-scale studies: Malpractice insurance for landscape ecologists.

Authors:  T J Stohlgren; D Binkley; T T Veblen; W L Baker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Big projects, big problems.

Authors:  B Zeide
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  On developing bioindicators for human and ecological health.

Authors:  J Burger; M Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Design to monitor trend in abundance and presence of American beaver (Castor canadensis) at the national forest scale.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Beck; Daniel C Dauwalter; Kenneth G Gerow; Gregory D Hayward
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 2.513
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.