Literature DB >> 24220316

Does modifying the thick texture and creamy flavour of a drink change portion size selection and intake?

Keri McCrickerd1, Lucy Chambers2, Martin R Yeomans2.   

Abstract

Previous research indicates that a drink's sensory characteristics can influence appetite regulation. Enhancing the thick and creamy sensory characteristics of a drink generated expectations of satiety and improved its actual satiating effects. Expectations about food also play an important role in decisions about intake, in which case enhancing the thick and creamy characteristics of a drink might also result in smaller portion size selection. In the current study forty-eight participants (24 female) completed four test days where they came into the laboratory for a fixed-portion breakfast, returning two hours later for a mid-morning drink, which they could serve themselves and consume as much as they liked. Over the test days, participants consumed an iso-energetic drink in four sensory contexts: thin and low-creamy; thin and high-creamy; thick and low-creamy; thick and high-creamy. Results indicated that participants consumed less of the thick drinks, but that this was only true of the female participants; male participants consumed the same amount of the four drinks regardless of sensory context. The addition of creamy flavour did not affect intake but the thicker drinks were associated with an increase in perceived creaminess. Despite differences in intake, hunger and fullness ratings did not differ across male and female participants and were not affected by the drinks sensory characteristics. The vast majority of participants consumed all of the drink they served themselves indicating that differences in intake reflected portion size decisions. These findings suggest women will select smaller portions of a drink when its sensory characteristics indicate that it will be satiating.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beverage; Creaminess; Expectations; MTM2; Mini-Traction-Machine tribometer; Satiation; Sensory characteristics; Viscosity; mPas; millimetres per second; millipascal-second; mms(−1); reciprocal seconds; s(−1)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24220316     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  6 in total

1.  Beyond expectations: the physiological basis of sensory enhancement of satiety.

Authors:  M R Yeomans; R Re; M Wickham; H Lundholm; L Chambers
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 2.  Expected Satiety: Application to Weight Management and Understanding Energy Selection in Humans.

Authors:  Ciarán G Forde; Eva Almiron-Roig; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-03

3.  Effects of Oral Exposure Duration and Gastric Energy Content on Appetite Ratings and Energy Intake in Lean Men.

Authors:  Anne G M Wijlens; Cees de Graaf; Alfrun Erkner; Monica Mars
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  Understanding Freshness Perception from the Cognitive Mechanisms of Flavor: The Case of Beverages.

Authors:  Jérémy Roque; Malika Auvray; Jérémie Lafraire
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-11

5.  Food texture influences on satiety: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ecaterina Stribiţcaia; Charlotte E L Evans; Catherine Gibbons; John Blundell; Anwesha Sarkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Textural Effects on Perceived Satiation and Ad Libitum Intake of Potato Chips in Males and Females.

Authors:  Jimmy Cahayadi; Sze Ying Leong; Indrawati Oey; Mei Peng
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.