Literature DB >> 24219852

Comparative study of 4 Fr versus 6 Fr nasobiliary drainage catheters: a randomized, controlled trial.

Takashi Ishigaki1, Tamito Sasaki, Masahiro Serikawa, Tomoyuki Minami, Akihito Okazaki, Masanobu Yukutake, Yasutaka Ishii, Keiichi Kosaka, Teruo Mouri, Satoshi Yoshimi, Kazuaki Chayama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Despite the benefits of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (NBD) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and nose/throat discomfort can result. We aimed to determine whether the use of a smaller catheter alleviates these complications.
METHOD: A randomized, controlled trial at a tertiary care center compared 4 Fr and 6 Fr NBD catheters; 165 ERCP patients with naïve papillae were randomly assigned to a catheter-size group.
RESULTS: The prevalence of PEP was significantly lower in the 4 Fr group (3.7%; 3/82) than in the 6 Fr group (15.7%; 13/83; P = 0.019). No spontaneous catheter displacement occurred within 24 h. Discomfort visual analog scores were 2.6 and 4.3 in the 4 Fr and 6 Fr groups, respectively (P = 0.0048) on procedure day; on the following day, the scores were 2.3 and 3.6 (P = 0.028). Bile output was 16.3 mL/h and 21.4 mL/h in the 4 Fr and 6 Fr groups (P = 0.051). On obstructive jaundice subgroup analysis, bile drainage was 19.2 mL/h and 22.1 mL/h in the 4 Fr and 6 Fr groups (P = 0.40). The 4 Fr group required 5.6 days to reduce bilirubin levels versus 6.1 days in the 6 Fr group (P = 0.51).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with naïve papillae, lower rates of PEP and less nose/throat discomfort are associated with the use of 4 Fr NBD catheters. In patients with obstructive jaundice, 4 Fr and 6 Fr catheters are comparable with regard to bile output and bilirubin level reduction.
© 2013 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis; visual analog scale

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24219852     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  5 in total

1.  Nasobiliary drainage: an effective treatment for pruritus in cholestatic liver disease.

Authors:  Wafaa Ahmed; Rebecca Jeyaraj; David Reffitt; John Devlin; Abid Suddle; John Hunt; Michael A Heneghan; Phillip Harrison; Deepak Joshi
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-11

2.  Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for obstructive jaundice using either a 5 Fr or 7 Fr catheter: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Toshio Fujisawa; Koichi Kagawa; Shunsuke Watanabe; Kantaro Hisatomi; Kensuke Kubota; Hajime Sato; Atsushi Nakajima; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Use of 4-Fr versus 6-Fr Nasobiliary Catheter for Biliary Drainage: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Tomofumi Tsuboi; Masahiro Serikawa; Tamito Sasaki; Yasutaka Ishii; Yoshifumi Fujimoto; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Takashi Ishigaki; Akinori Shimizu; Keisuke Kurihara; Yumiko Tatsukawa; Eisuke Miyaki; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2017-04-19

4.  Endoscopic Hands-Off Technique versus Conventional Technique for Conversion from an Orobiliary to a Nasobiliary Tube.

Authors:  Min Jae Yang; Jae Chul Hwang; Miyeon Lee; Choong-Kyun Noh; Soon Sun Kim; Byung Moo Yoo; Jin Hong Kim
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Effectiveness of a modified 6-Fr endoscopic nasobiliary drainage catheter for patients with preoperative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroki Kawashima; Yoshiki Hirooka; Eizaburo Ohno; Takuya Ishikawa; Ryoji Miyahara; Osamu Watanabe; Kazuhiko Hayashi; Masatoshi Ishigami; Senju Hashimoto; Tomoki Ebata; Masato Nagino; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-08-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.