Literature DB >> 24219080

Outcomes of surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease.

Culley C Carson1, Laurence A Levine.   

Abstract

The aims of the present review were to assess the literature on published outcomes and complications associated with surgical treatments for Peyronie's disease (PD) and to assist clinicians in the effective management of PD by increasing understanding and awareness of the outcomes associated with current surgical treatment options. A PubMed literature search was conducted to identify relevant, peer-reviewed clinical and review articles published between January 1980 and October 2013 related to outcomes of surgical correction of PD. Search terms for this non-systematic review included 'Peyronie's disease', 'outcomes', 'complications', 'erectile dysfunction or ED', 'patient expectation', and 'patient satisfaction'; search terms were searched separately and in combination. Case studies and editorials were excluded, primary manuscripts and reviews were included, and bibliographies of articles of interest were reviewed and key references were obtained. Assessment of the study design, methodology, clinical relevance and impact on the surgical outcomes of PD was performed on the sixty-one articles that were selected and analysed. Currently, there are several investigational minimally invasive and non-surgical treatment options for PD; however, surgical treatment remains the standard of care for patients with stable disease and disabling deformity or drug-resistant erectile dysfunction. Each of the different surgical procedures that are used for treatment of PD, including tunical shortening, tunical lengthening (plaque incisions or partial excision and grafting), and use of inflatable penile prostheses, carries its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of potential complications and postoperative satisfaction. Because of the variety of ways that PD may present in affected patients, no single, standard, surgical treatment for this disorder has prevailed and multiple variations of each type of procedure may exist. Surgical outcomes of the most commonly used procedures are not substantially different; therefore, the appropriateness of each treatment option may often depend on disease and patient characteristics (e.g. deformity and erectile function). Surgical algorithms have been published to guide surgeons and patients through the selection of surgical procedures in the absence of conclusive, long-term outcome data. Accumulating data on outcomes associated with established procedures, modifications to these procedures, and new surgical techniques and materials may serve to further guide practice and refine evidence-based selection of the surgical approach.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peyronie's disease; complications; erectile dysfunction; outcomes; surgical treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24219080     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  18 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie's disease and corporal fibrosis.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Premsant Sangkum; Ian Ross McCaslin; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Penile ossification: A reconstructive challenge.

Authors:  Arthi Satyanarayan; Nirmish Singla; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

3.  Penile Sensory Changes After Plaque Incision and Grafting Surgery for Peyronie's Disease.

Authors:  Jean E Terrier; Raanan Tal; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  2013-2014 updates in Peyronie's disease management.

Authors:  Benjamin A Sherer; Krishnan Warrior; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Pietro Grande; Gabriele Antonini; Cristiano Cristini; Ettore De Berardinis; Antonio Gatto; Giovanni Di Lascio; Andrea Lemma; Giuseppe Gentile; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Autologous testicular tunica vaginalis graft in Peyronie's disease: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Yernur Ainayev; Ulanbek Zhanbyrbekuly; Abduzhappar Gaipov; Nurlan Kissamedenov; Ulan Zhaparov; Makhmud Suleiman; Saltanat Urazova; Nurila Rakhmetova; Dulat Turebayev; Nurbol Keulimzhayev; Rano Zhankina; Gafur Khairli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Do adult men with untreated ventral penile curvature have adverse outcomes?

Authors:  Vani Menon; Benjamin Breyer; Hillary L Copp; Laurence Baskin; Michael Disandro; Bruce J Schlomer
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 8.  Comparing and Contrasting Peyronie's Disease Guidelines: Points of Consensus and Deviation.

Authors:  Madeleine G Manka; Lindsay A White; Faysal A Yafi; John P Mulhall; Laurence A Levine; Matthew J Ziegelmann
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Special considerations for placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis for the patient with Peyronie's disease: techniques and patient preference.

Authors:  Matthew D Lyons; Culley C Carson; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-07-27

Review 10.  A review of surgical strategies for penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie's disease.

Authors:  James Anaissie; Faysal A Yafi
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.