Literature DB >> 24218778

Opioid regulation: time to reconsider the nomenclature and approach.

Danuta Mendelson1, George Mendelson.   

Abstract

In Australia, deaths due to the ingestion of opioid analgesics, though numerically small, have been increasing at a rapid rate. The reasons for this increase are multifactorial; the conceptually outdated legislation that controls prescription and administration of opioid analgesics might be one of them. The stated purposes of the governing statutory instruments include prevention of the improper use of drugs of dependence and protection of the public. However, in order to achieve these aims, the relevant legislation should utilise theories and definitions that are consistent with the medical understanding of the relevant physiology and behaviour, so as to provide a common linguistic and conceptual platform for regulatory and clinical decision-makers. Although Victoria, with its intricate statutory framework for Schedule 8 poisons, is used as an example of an obsolescent approach to the concept of drug dependency, conclusions reached are applicable to other jurisdictions, other scheduled drugs, and all health care practitioners who have the statutory authority to possess and prescribe them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24218778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med        ISSN: 1320-159X


  1 in total

Review 1.  Opioid prescribing pitfalls: medicolegal and regulatory issues.

Authors:  Walid Jammal; Grace Gown
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-09-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.