Jane Banaszak-Holl1, Nicholas G Castle2, Michael K Lin3, Nijika Shrivastwa4, Gretchen Spreitzer5. 1. Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. janebh@umich.edu. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Providigm, LLC, Denver, Colorado. 4. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor. 5. Department of Management and Organizations, University of Michigan Ross Business School, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We examined how organizational culture in nursing homes affects staff turnover, because culture is a first step to creating satisfactory work environments. DESIGN AND METHODS: Nursing home administrators were asked in 2009 to report on facility culture and staff turnover. We received responses from 419 of 1,056 administrators contacted. Respondents reported the strength of cultural values using scales from a Competing Values Framework and percent of staff leaving annually for Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN), and nursing aide (NA) staff. We estimated negative binomial models predicting turnover. RESULTS: Turnover rates are lower than found in past but remain significantly higher among NAs than among RNs or LPNs. Facilities with stronger market values had increased turnover among RNs and LPNs, and among NAs when turnover was adjusted for facilities with few staff. Facilities emphasizing hierarchical internal processes had lower RN turnover. Group and developmental values focusing on staff and innovation only lowered LPN turnover. Finally, effects on NA turnover become insignificant when turnover was adjusted if voluntary turnover was reported. IMPLICATIONS: Organizational culture had differential effects on the turnover of RN, LPN, and NA staff that should be addressed in developing culture-change strategies. More flexible organizational culture values were important for LPN staff only, whereas unexpectedly, greater emphasis on rigid internal rules helped facilities retain RNs. Facilities with a stronger focus on customer needs had higher turnover among all staff.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We examined how organizational culture in nursing homes affects staff turnover, because culture is a first step to creating satisfactory work environments. DESIGN AND METHODS: Nursing home administrators were asked in 2009 to report on facility culture and staff turnover. We received responses from 419 of 1,056 administrators contacted. Respondents reported the strength of cultural values using scales from a Competing Values Framework and percent of staff leaving annually for Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN), and nursing aide (NA) staff. We estimated negative binomial models predicting turnover. RESULTS: Turnover rates are lower than found in past but remain significantly higher among NAs than among RNs or LPNs. Facilities with stronger market values had increased turnover among RNs and LPNs, and among NAs when turnover was adjusted for facilities with few staff. Facilities emphasizing hierarchical internal processes had lower RN turnover. Group and developmental values focusing on staff and innovation only lowered LPN turnover. Finally, effects on NA turnover become insignificant when turnover was adjusted if voluntary turnover was reported. IMPLICATIONS: Organizational culture had differential effects on the turnover of RN, LPN, and NA staff that should be addressed in developing culture-change strategies. More flexible organizational culture values were important for LPN staff only, whereas unexpectedly, greater emphasis on rigid internal rules helped facilities retain RNs. Facilities with a stronger focus on customer needs had higher turnover among all staff.
Authors: Stephen M Shortell; Jill A Marsteller; Michael Lin; Marjorie L Pearson; Shin-Yi Wu; Peter Mendel; Shan Cretin; Mayde Rosen Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Justine S Sefcik; Caroline Madrigal; Allison R Heid; Sheila L Molony; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Irene Best; Barbara Resnick; Elizabeth Galik; Marie Boltz; Ann Kolanowski Journal: J Gerontol Nurs Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 1.254
Authors: Clara Berridge; Julie Lima; Margot Schwartz; Christine Bishop; Susan C Miller Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: William N Dowd; Jeremy W Bray; Carolina Barbosa; Krista Brockwood; David J Kaiser; Michael J Mills; David A Hurtado; Brad Wipfli Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.162