Literature DB >> 24218125

Biological variations of some analytes in renal posttransplant patients: a different way to assess routine parameters.

Ozlem Goruroglu Ozturk1, Saime Paydas, Mustafa Balal, Gulhan Sahin, Esin Damla Ziyanoglu Karacor, Sedefgul Yuzbasioglu Ariyurek, Akgun Yaman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biological variation (BV) data of analytes have been used to evaluate the significant changes in serial results (reference change value, RCV) of healthy individuals in clinical laboratories. However, BV data of healthy subjects may not be identical to the analytes of patients with ongoing clinical condition. The aim of this study was to calculate intra-(CVw) (coefficient of variation for intra-individual BV) and inter-individual (CVg) BV, index of individuality, and RCV of nine serum analytes of renal posttransplant patients.
METHODS: Six serum specimens were obtained in an interval of two months in a one-year period from 70 transplant patients who had been stable for three years. Each time creatinine, uric acid, urea, sodium, potassium, calcium, inorganic phosphate, total protein, and albumin of these patients were analyzed with an integrated clinical chemistry/immunoassay auto-analyzer. ANOVA tests were used to calculate the variations. Results were compared with the data of healthy subjects obtained from BV database.
RESULTS: CVw of all nine analytes of the renal transplant patients were higher than the healthy subjects. RCVs of these analytes were calculated as 14.5% for creatinine, 16.5% for urea, 13.7% for urate, 12.57% for albumin, 8.26% for total protein, 3.25% for sodium, 12.81% for potassium, 5.88% for calcium, and 21.57% for inorganic phosphate.
CONCLUSION: RCV concept for predicting the clinical status in posttransplant population represents an optimization of laboratory reporting and could be a valuable tool for clinical decision.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analytical variation; index of individuality; intra-individual BV; reference change value; renal transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24218125      PMCID: PMC6807446          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  23 in total

1.  Are equally spaced specimen collections necessary to assess biological variation? Evidence from renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  C Biosca; C Ricós; C V Jiménez; R Lauzurica; R Galimany
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variation.

Authors:  C Ricós; F Cava; J V García-Lario; A Hernández; N Iglesias; C V Jiménez; J Minchinela; C Perich; M Simón; M V Domenech; V Alvarez
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.713

Review 3.  Inherent biological variation and reference values.

Authors:  Callum G Fraser
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications.

Authors:  C G Fraser; P H Petersen
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  What is a significant difference between sequential laboratory results?

Authors:  W S A Smellie
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Renal transplant rejection markers.

Authors:  Wilfried Gwinner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry.

Authors:  C G Fraser; E K Harris
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.250

8.  Reference change value for HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  J Trapé; M L Aliart; M Brunet; E Dern; E Abadal; J M Queraltó
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Biological variation at long-term renal post-transplantation.

Authors:  Carmen Biosca; Carmen Ricós; Ricardo Lauzurica; Per Hyltoft Petersen
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.786

10.  Confidence intervals and power calculations for within-person biological variation: effect of analytical imprecision, number of replicates, number of samples, and number of individuals.

Authors:  Thomas Røraas; Per H Petersen; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  1 in total

1.  Variation in biochemistry test results between annual wellness visits in apparently healthy Golden Retrievers.

Authors:  Unity Jeffery; Nick D Jeffery; Kate E Creevy; Rod Page; Melissa J Simpson
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.333

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.