| Literature DB >> 24217205 |
Youzhi Feng1, Xiangui Lin, Yongchang Yu, Huayong Zhang, Haiyan Chu, Jianguo Zhu.
Abstract
The current knowledge regarding the effect of global climaEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24217205 PMCID: PMC3824163 DOI: 10.1038/srep03193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Concentrations of dissolved organic C (DOC) and acetate in paddy soils (a), copy numbers of methanogenic archaeal and Methanosaeta 16 s rRNA genes (b) and the dynamic curves of methane production in incubated flooded paddy soils (c) under elevated ground-level O3 (FACE-O3) and ambient O3 (Ambient) concentrations.
Data are expressed as the means with standard deviation (SD). There were 12 soil samples in total. Significant differences are indicated by different letters shown above the error bars (p < 0.05), and mean separation was assessed by Tukey's multiple range test. The capital, small and underlined letters indicate different assays.
Figure 2The 100% stacked column chart of relative abundances of the dominant methanogenic genera derived from 16 s rRNA genes in all paddy soils combined and in each soil sample.
*The value of each genus percentage is the mean of triplicates in Table S1.
Paddy methanogenic archaeal phylogenetic diversity and Chao1 indices under different ground-level O3 concentrations at the two rice growth stages
| Soil samples | Phylogenetic Diversity | Chao1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tillering stage | FACE-O3 | 31.3(2.5 | 1160(302)a |
| Ambient | 37.8(0.9)B | 1891(111)b | |
| Anthesis stage | FACE-O3 | 37.1(2.0)AB | 1548(359)ab |
| Ambient | 33.5(3.0)AB | 1790(105)ab |
*Both indices were calculated using the subset of 3,500 sequences per soil sample.
#Numbers in the parenthesis are the standard deviations.
Figure 3Methanogenic archaeal community compositional structure in soils as indicated by a non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plot of the weighted pairwise UniFrac community distances between different soil samples.
Figure 4Venn diagrams comparing the OTU memberships among different soil samples.
The OTU size in parenthesis under each sample name was calculated from the subset of 3,500 sequences per soil sample. The percentage of unique OTUs was reported in parenthesis.
Figure 5Significant changes in genera under elevated ground-level O3 according to the response ratio method at a 95% confidence interval.