Literature DB >> 24215374

The benefit of a second burst antitachycardia sequence for fast ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Ignasi Anguera1, Paolo Dallaglio, Xavier Sabaté, Elaine Nuñez, Montserrat Gracida, Andrea Di Marco, Gema Sugrañes, Angel Cequier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), an empirical burst of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is moderately effective in terminating fast ventricular tachycardias (FVTs). It is unknown whether, in the case of failure of a first burst, a second burst attempt increases the efficacy of the intervention, without increasing morbidity. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a strategy of programming successive ATP sequences for FVT episodes.
METHODS: A prospective study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of programming successive ATP sequences for termination of FVT episodes (cycle lengths [CLs] 250-320 ms) treated by one ATP sequence and, in the event of failure, by successive ATP attempts or shocks.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 54 months, 267 FVT episodes (mean CL of 295 ± 18 ms) were detected in 35 patients. Effectiveness of the first burst ATP was 64% (65% GEE-adjusted, where GEE is generalized estimating equation) and increased significantly to 83% (75% GEE-adjusted) with the second burst ATP sequence (P = 0.01). In the remaining 17% of FVT episodes with failure of the second ATP, successive bursts and shocks were required. Multivariate analysis showed that primary prevention ICD (odds ratio [OR] 5.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-14.5, P = 0.001), sinus rhythm (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.4-13.4, P = 0.01), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.2-4.8, P = 0.02), and longer VT CL (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, P = 0.002) were independently associated with effectiveness of the first or second burst pacing sequence.
CONCLUSION: The addition of a second burst pacing attempt increases the effectiveness of ATP for FVT and, therefore, reduces the need for high-energy shocks. ©2013, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antitachycardia pacing; burst; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; shock; tachycardia; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24215374     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

Review 1.  Optimal programming management of ventricular tachycardia storm in ICD patients.

Authors:  Zhiyong Qian; Jianghong Guo; Zhiyong Zhang; Yao Wang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2015-01-05

2.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  Anti-tachycardia pacing for non-fast and fast ventricular tachycardias in individual Japanese patients: From Nippon-storm study.

Authors:  Masaomi Chinushi; Osamu Saitoh; Hiroshi Furushima; Yoshifusa Aizawa; Takashi Noda; Takashi Nitta; Tohru Ohe; Takashi Kurita
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-06-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.