Literature DB >> 24214929

Anterior cruciate ligament injury and radiologic progression of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adil Ajuied1, Fabian Wong2, Christian Smith2, Mark Norris2, Peter Earnshaw2, Diane Back2, Andrew Davies3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has previously been reported. However, there has been no meta-analysis reporting the development and progression of osteoarthritis.
PURPOSE: We present the first meta-analysis reporting on the development and progression of osteoarthritis after ACL injury at a minimum mean follow-up of 10 years, using a single and widely accepted radiologic classification, the Kellgren & Lawrence classification. STUDY
DESIGN: Meta-analysis.
METHOD: Articles were included for systematic review if they reported radiologic findings of ACL-injured knees and controls using the Kellgren & Lawrence classification at a minimum mean follow-up period of 10 years. Appropriate studies were then included for meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Nine studies were included for systematic review, of which 6 studies were further included for meta-analysis. One hundred twenty-one of 596 (20.3%) ACL-injured knees had moderate or severe radiologic changes (Kellgren & Lawrence grade III or IV) compared with 23 of 465 (4.9%) uninjured ACL-intact contralateral knees. After ACL injury, irrespective of whether the patients were treated operatively or nonoperatively, the relative risk (RR) of developing even minimal osteoarthritis was 3.89 (P < .00001), while the RR of developing moderate to severe osteoarthritis (grade III and IV) was 3.84 (P < .0004). Nonoperatively treated ACL-injured knees had significantly higher RR (RR, 4.98; P < .00001) of developing any grade of osteoarthritis compared with those treated with reconstructive surgery (RR, 3.62; P < .00001). Investigation of progression to moderate or severe osteoarthritis (grade III or IV only) after 10 years showed that ACL-reconstructed knees had a significantly higher RR (RR, 4.71; P < .00001) compared with nonoperative management (RR, 2.41; P = .54). It was not possible to stratify for return to sports among the patients undergoing ACL reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: Results support the proposition that ACL injury predisposes knees to osteoarthritis, while ACL reconstruction surgery has a role in reducing the risk of developing degenerative changes at 10 years. However, returning to sports activities after ligament reconstruction may exacerbate the development of arthritis.
© 2013 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; knee injury; meta-analysis; osteoarthritis; radiology; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24214929     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513508376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  123 in total

Review 1.  [The time-related risk for knee osteoarthritis after ACL injury. Results from a systematic review].

Authors:  G Spahn; M Schiltenwolf; B Hartmann; J Grifka; G O Hofmann; H-T Klemm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Preoperative KOOS and SF-36 Scores Are Associated With the Development of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis at 7 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  J Kristopher Ware; Brett D Owens; Matthew R Akelman; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Excellent long-term results in combined high tibial osteotomy, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and chondral resurfacing in patients with severe osteoarthritis and varus alignment.

Authors:  Philipp Schuster; Michael Schlumberger; Philipp Mayer; Martin Eichinger; Markus Geßlein; Martin Schulz-Jahrsdörfer; Jörg Richter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Biochemical markers of cartilage metabolism are associated with walking biomechanics 6-months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian Pietrosimone; Richard F Loeser; J Troy Blackburn; Darin A Padua; Matthew S Harkey; Laura E Stanley; Brittney A Luc-Harkey; Veronica Ulici; Stephen W Marshall; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffery T Spang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Clinical outcome after UKA and HTO in ACL deficiency: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Mancuso; Thomas W Hamilton; Vijay Kumar; David W Murray; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Validation of porcine knee as a sex-specific model to study human anterior cruciate ligament disorders.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Matthew R Shalvoy; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Review of evolution of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Faizal Rayan; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Darryl Ramoutar; Sujith Konan; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

8.  Return to sports after ACL reconstruction: a paradigm shift from time to function.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Christian Fink; Sebastian Kopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.

Authors:  Gregory S DiFelice; Jelle P van der List
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 10.  Combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis does not result in an increased rate of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Brian M Devitt; Nicolas Bouguennec; Kristoffer W Barfod; Tabitha Porter; Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.