Literature DB >> 24214905

Reduced subcutaneous tissue distribution of cefazolin in morbidly obese versus non-obese patients determined using clinical microdialysis.

Margreke J E Brill1, Aletta P I Houwink, Stephan Schmidt, Eric P A Van Dongen, Eric J Hazebroek, Bert van Ramshorst, Vera H Deneer, Johan W Mouton, Catherijne A J Knibbe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As morbidly obese patients are prone to surgical site infections, adequate blood and subcutaneous tissue concentrations of prophylactic antibiotic agents during surgery are imperative. In this study we evaluated cefazolin subcutaneous adipose tissue distribution in morbidly obese and non-obese patients, thereby quantifying the influence of morbid obesity on cefazolin pharmacokinetics and enabling Monte Carlo simulations for subsequent dose adjustments.
METHODS: Nine morbidly obese patients [body mass index (BMI) 47 ± 6 kg/m(2)], of whom eight were evaluable, and seven non-obese patients (BMI 28 ± 3 kg/m(2)) received cefazolin 2 g intravenously before surgery (NCT01309152). Using microdialysis, interstitial space fluid (ISF) samples of subcutaneous adipose tissue were collected together with total and unbound plasma cefazolin samples until 240 min after dosing. Using NONMEM, population pharmacokinetic modelling, covariate analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed.
RESULTS: The unbound (free) cefazolin ISF penetration ratio (fAUC(tissue)/fAUC(plasma)) was 0.70 (range 0.68-0.83) in morbidly obese patients versus 1.02 (range 0.85-1.41) in non-obese patients (P < 0.05). A two-compartment model with saturable protein binding was identified in which the central volume of distribution and cefazolin distribution from the central compartment to the ISF compartment proved dependent on body weight (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Monte Carlo simulations showed reduced probability of target attainment for morbidly obese versus non-obese patients for MIC values of 2 and 4 mg/L.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that cefazolin tissue distribution is lower in morbidly obese patients and reduces with increasing body weight, and that dose adjustments are required in this patient group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulations; population pharmacokinetics; subcutaneous ISF; surgical prophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24214905     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  40 in total

1.  Cefoxitin Plasma and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Concentration in Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Luigi Brunetti; Leonid Kagan; Glenn Forrester; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hongxia Lin; Steven Buyske; Ronald G Nahass
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Continuous versus short-term infusion of cefuroxime: assessment of concept based on plasma, subcutaneous tissue, and bone pharmacokinetics in an animal model.

Authors:  Mikkel Tøttrup; Bo M Bibby; Tore F Hardlei; Mats Bue; Sigrid Kerrn-Jespersen; Kurt Fuursted; Kjeld Søballe; Hanne Birke-Sørensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  What's new in postoperative intensive care after bariatric surgery?

Authors:  Philippe Montravers; Lara Ribeiro-Parenti; Camille Welsch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Continuous administration of linezolid in pneumonia: what is the level of proof?

Authors:  Olivier Mimoz; Philippe Montravers; José-Artur Paiva
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  A population pharmacokinetic model of intravenous telavancin in healthy individuals to assess tissue exposure.

Authors:  Sami Ullah; Peter Matzneller; Markus Zeitlinger; Uwe Fuhr; Max Taubert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Utility of Microdialysis in Infectious Disease Drug Development and Dose Optimization.

Authors:  Amelia N Deitchman; M Tobias Heinrichs; Vipada Khaowroongrueng; Satyawan B Jadhav; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Tissue distribution and dermal drug determination of indomethacin transdermal-absorption patches.

Authors:  Jingjing Ma; Ying Gao; Yinghua Sun; Dawei Ding; Qi Zhang; Bingjun Sun; Menglin Wang; Jin Sun; Zhonggui He
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.617

8.  Association between Pre-Operative Cefazolin Dose and Surgical Site Infection in Obese Patients.

Authors:  William J Peppard; David G Eberle; Nathan W Kugler; Danielle M Mabrey; John A Weigelt
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.150

9.  Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Cefazolin Dosage Adaptation in Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis Based on a Nomogram.

Authors:  Ronan Bellouard; Colin Deschanvres; Guillaume Deslandes; Éric Dailly; Nathalie Asseray; Pascale Jolliet; David Boutoille; Benjamin Gaborit; Matthieu Grégoire
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Efficacious Cefazolin Prophylactic Dose for Morbidly Obese Women Undergoing Bariatric Surgery Based on Evidence from Subcutaneous Microdialysis and Populational Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Authors:  Eduardo Celia Palma; Nelson Guardiola Meinhardt; Airton Tetelbom Stein; Isabela Heineck; Maria Isabel Fischer; BibianaVerlindo de Araújo; Teresa Dalla Costa
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.