Literature DB >> 24214557

Attention and the measurement of perceptual learning.

D Laberge1.   

Abstract

Novel and familiar letters were presented to Ss under conditions which controlled momentary attention states. The latencies of letter matching for the novel and familiar letters did not differ when Ss were expecting the particular letters which were presented. However, latencies to the two types of letters differed significantly when Ss were not expecting the particular letters which were presented. Additional exposures significantly reduced this difference, thereby generating a perceptual learning curve in terms of response latency. The main findings were interpreted in terms of a model of perceptual processing which involves mechanisms for hierarchical coding, selective attention, and automatic processing.

Year:  1973        PMID: 24214557     DOI: 10.3758/BF03198108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; G T Gardner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-04

3.  Verbal expectancy and probability in two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  J V Hinrichs; J L Craft
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

4.  Effect of type of catch trial upon generalization gradients of reaction time.

Authors:  D La Berge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-02

5.  Rate of information processing in visual perception: some results and methodological considerations.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; T Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-02

6.  Chronometric analysis of classification.

Authors:  M I Posner; R F Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 8.934

  6 in total
  13 in total

1.  Automaticity training for dyslexics: An experimental study.

Authors:  L K Holt-Ochsner; F R Manis
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1992-12

2.  Contextual control of letter perception.

Authors:  R J Petersen; D Laberge
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-03

3.  How much processing do nonattended stimuli receive? Apparently very little, but....

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J M Webb; L R Fournier
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-05

4.  When redundancy hurts letter detection: an attempt to define one condition.

Authors:  N F Johnson; A J Blum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

5.  Within-set discriminations in a consistent mapping search task.

Authors:  J M Flach
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-06

6.  The effect of set on categorization in visual search.

Authors:  H Gleitman; J Jonides
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-10

7.  Degree of consistent training: improvements in search performance and automatic process development.

Authors:  W Schneider; A D Fisk
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-02

8.  A developmental study of vigilance in learning-disabled and nondisabled children.

Authors:  H L Swanson
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1983-09

9.  Perceptual learning and attention: Reduction of object attention limitations with practice.

Authors:  Barbara Anne Dosher; Songmei Han; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The search for subtypes of specific reading disability: Reflections from a cognitive perspective.

Authors:  M W Lovett
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1984-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.