Literature DB >> 2421415

The angiographic response of osteosarcoma following pre-operative chemotherapy.

W Kumpan, G Lechner, G R Wittich, M Salzer-Kuntschik, G Delling, R Kotz, P Hajek, J Sekera.   

Abstract

The prognosis of osteosarcoma has improved significantly with recent advances in chemotherapy. Evaluation of the effect of chemotherapy is important for optimal timing of surgery, for selecting an alternative drug regimen in instances of poor response to chemotherapy and for testing combinations of new drugs. The purpose of this paper is to define the value of plain radiographs and angiography in assessing tumor response to chemotherapy. Studies were obtained before and after chemotherapy. The radiographic results were correlated with histologic evaluation of the resected specimen. Patients with less than 10% residual viable tumor in the resected bone were designated "responders" and patients with more than 10% of remaining viable tumor were "nonresponders". Angiographic appearances correctly separated 15 patients with good response to chemotherapy from seven patients who were not responsive. Conversely, comparison of plain radiographs obtained before and after chemotherapy did not allow a reliable differentiation between patients with good, poor, or no response to chemotherapy. The current role of angiography in the management of patients with osteosarcoma is discussed. It is concluded that - in contrast to plain film radiography - angiography is an accurate method for assessing the response of osteosarcoma to chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2421415     DOI: 10.1007/bf00350201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  16 in total

1.  Adjuvant methotrexate and citrovorum-factor treatment of osteogenic sarcoma.

Authors:  N Jaffe; E Frei; D Traggis; Y Bishop
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-11-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Response of osteosarcoma to preoperative intravenous high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy: CT evaluation.

Authors:  J T Mail; M D Cohen; L D Mirkin; A J Provisor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Surgical treatment in the COSS 80 study.

Authors:  R Kotz; W Becker; M Immenkamp
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Synovial hyperemia in giant cell tumor of bone: angiographic pitfall.

Authors:  L A deSantos; A Prando
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Rotation-plasty for childhood osteosarcoma of the distal part of the femur.

Authors:  R Kotz; M Salzer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Morphological grades of regression in osteosarcoma after polychemotherapy - study COSS 80.

Authors:  M Salzer-Kuntschik; G Delling; G Beron; R Sigmund
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: selection of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the response of the primary tumor to preoperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Rosen; B Caparros; A G Huvos; C Kosloff; A Nirenberg; A Cacavio; R C Marcove; J M Lane; B Mehta; C Urban
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Computed tomography of osteosarcoma after intraarterial chemotherapy.

Authors:  A Shirkhoda; N Jaffe; S Wallace; A Ayala; M M Lindell; J Zornoza
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Digital subtraction angiography for preoperative evaluation of extremity tumors.

Authors:  D M Paushter; G P Borkowski; E Buonocore; G H Belhobek; K E Marks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  En bloc resections for osteogenic sarcoma.

Authors:  R C Marcove; G Rosen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  5 in total

1.  Monitoring therapeutic responses of primary bone tumors by diffusion-weighted image: Initial results.

Authors:  Yoshiko Hayashida; Toshitake Yakushiji; Kazuo Awai; Kazuhiro Katahira; Yoshiharu Nakayama; Osamu Shimomura; Mika Kitajima; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Hiroshi Mizuta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Scintigraphic evaluation of tumor regression during preoperative chemotherapy of osteosarcoma. Correlation of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate parametric imaging with surgical histopathology.

Authors:  J Knop; G Delling; U Heise; K Winkler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Factor analysis as a means of determining response to chemotherapy in patients with osteogenic sarcoma.

Authors:  V Edeline; F Frouin; J P Bazin; M Di Paola; C Kalifa; G Contesso; C Parmentier; J Lumbroso; R Di Paola
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-12

4.  Prognostic significance of spontaneous tumour necrosis in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  J Björnsson; C Y Inwards; L E Wold; F H Sim; W F Taylor
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1993

5.  The value of diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring the chemotherapeutic response of osteosarcoma: a comparison between average apparent diffusion coefficient and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Oka; Toshitake Yakushiji; Hiro Sato; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Hiroshi Mizuta
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.