Literature DB >> 24213977

On testing for stochastic dissociations.

R A Poldrack1.   

Abstract

Methods for examining stochastic relationships have been proposed as powerful ways to dissociate different underlying psychological processes, but a number of problems have undermined conclusions based upon these methods. These testing methods and criticisms are reviewed, and the statistical methods for the testing of stochastic dependence are examined using computer simulation. With each of the methods examined, there were difficulties dealing with certain situations that are likely to occur in experiments examining dependence between successive tests. Examination also showed that the sample sizes of some previous studies were insufficient for findings of moderate amounts of dependence, calling some conclusions of stochastic independence into question. The results of the studies presented here suggest that testing for statistical dependence is a statistically perilous technique, but they also suggest several ways in which dedicated users of this form of testing can strengthen its application.

Year:  1996        PMID: 24213977     DOI: 10.3758/BF03214547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

1.  A method for judging measures of stochastic dependence: further comments on the current controversy.

Authors:  A L Ostergaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Contingent dissociation between recognition and fragment completion: the method of triangulation.

Authors:  C A Hayman; E Tulving
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: constraints on the construction of structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney; M A Peterson; M Tharan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Human learning and memory: connections and dissociations.

Authors:  D L Hintzman
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 5.  The attention system of the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

7.  Memory for unattended events: remembering with and without awareness.

Authors:  E Eich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-03
  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  The role of taxonomies in the study of human memory.

Authors:  D B Willingham; K Goedert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  A single-system model predicts recognition memory and repetition priming in amnesia.

Authors:  Christopher J Berry; Roy P C Kessels; Arie J Wester; David R Shanks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The influence of object relative size on priming and explicit memory.

Authors:  Bob Uttl; Peter Graf; Amy L Siegenthaler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Regressive research: The pitfalls of post hoc data selection in the study of unconscious mental processes.

Authors:  David R Shanks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.