Literature DB >> 24213957

Spectral analyses of wrist motion in individuals poststroke: the development of a performance measure with promise for unsupervised settings.

Eric Wade1, Christina Chen, Carolee J Winstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity use in daily life is a critical ingredient of continued functional recovery after cerebral stroke. However, time-evolutions of use-dependent motion quality are poorly understood due to limitations of existing measurement tools.
OBJECTIVE: Proof-of-concept study to determine if spectral analyses explain the variability of known temporal kinematic movement quality (ie, movement duration, number of peaks, jerk) for uncontrolled reach-to-grasp tasks.
METHODS: Ten individuals with chronic stroke performed unimanual goal-directed movements using both hands, with and without task object present, wearing accelerometers on each wrist. Temporal and spectral measures were extracted for each gesture. The effects of performance condition on outcome measures were determined using 2-way, within subject, hand (nonparetic vs paretic) × object (present vs absent) analysis of variance. Regression analyses determined if spectral measures explained the variability of the temporal measures.
RESULTS: There were main effects of hand on all 3 temporal measures and main effects of object on movement duration and peaks. For the paretic limb, spectral measures explain 41.2% and 51.1% of the variability in movement duration and peaks, respectively. For the nonparetic limb, spectral measures explain 40.1%, 42.5%, and 27.8% of the variability of movement duration, peaks, and jerk, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Spectral measures explain the variability of motion efficiency and control in individuals with stroke. Signal power from 1.0 to 2.0 Hz is sensitive to changes in hand and object. Analyzing the evolution of this measure in ambient environments may provide as yet uncharted information useful for evaluating long-term recovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometry; hemiplegia; kinematics; motion sensing; stroke rehabilitation; upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24213957      PMCID: PMC3900236          DOI: 10.1177/1545968313505911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  32 in total

1.  Estimating Fugl-Meyer clinical scores in stroke survivors using wearable sensors.

Authors:  Silvia Del Din; Shyamal Patel; Claudio Cobelli; Paolo Bonato
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

2.  Goniometer measurement and computer analysis of wrist angles and movements applied to occupational repetitive work.

Authors:  G A Hansson; I Balogh; K Ohlsson; L Rylander; S Skerfving
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective.

Authors:  R N Barker; S G Brauer
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2005-10-30       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 4.  Reflections of experience-expectant development in repair of the adult damaged brain.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones; Stephanie C Jefferson
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke.

Authors:  G Uswatte; E Taub; D Morris; K Light; P A Thompson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery.

Authors:  Brandon Rohrer; Susan Fasoli; Hermano Igo Krebs; Richard Hughes; Bruce Volpe; Walter R Frontera; Joel Stein; Neville Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sensitivity of smoothness measures to movement duration, amplitude, and arrests.

Authors:  Neville Hogan; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Quantifying kinematics of purposeful movements to real, imagined, or absent functional objects: implications for modelling trajectories for robot-assisted ADL tasks.

Authors:  Kimberly J Wisneski; Michelle J Johnson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Origins of submovements in movements of elderly adults.

Authors:  Laetitia Fradet; Gyusung Lee; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  3 in total

1.  Interrater reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale: why it matters.

Authors:  Susan V Duff; Jiaxiu He; Monica A Nelsen; Christianne J Lane; Veronica T Rowe; Steve L Wolf; Alexander W Dromerick; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Quantifying intra- and interlimb use during unimanual and bimanual tasks in persons with hemiparesis post-stroke.

Authors:  Susan V Duff; Aaron Miller; Lori Quinn; Gregory Youdan; Lauri Bishop; Heather Ruthrauff; Eric Wade
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  Acceleration metrics are responsive to change in upper extremity function of stroke survivors.

Authors:  M A Urbin; Kimberly J Waddell; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.060

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.