Literature DB >> 24213934

Signal probability effects on high-workload vigilance tasks.

G Matthews1.   

Abstract

Signal probability is an important influence on vigilance. Typically, higher signal probability is associated with higher hit rate, lower response criterion, and lower response:signal ratio. However, signal probability effects on demanding, high-workload vigilance tasks have not been investigated. It is believed that attentional resources become depleted during performance of such tasks, leading to perceptual sensitivity decrements. Forty subjects performed high- (.35) and low- (.10) probability versions of a demanding vigilance task. Results differed in two important respects from those previously obtained with less demanding tasks. First, the decrement in perceptual sensitivity over time was greater for the high-probability task. Second, there were no effects of signal probability on response criterion. Subjective workload was higher for the high-probability task. Implications of the data for resource-depletion and expectancy theories of vigilance are discussed.

Year:  1996        PMID: 24213934     DOI: 10.3758/BF03210757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  6 in total

1.  Signal detection theory and probability matching apply to vigilance.

Authors:  A Craig
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Manipulating the response criterion in visual monitoring.

Authors:  R C Williges
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Signal probability and vigilance: a reappraisal of the 'signal-rate' effect.

Authors:  A D Baddeley; W P Colquhoun
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1969-05

4.  Cognitive predictors of vigilance.

Authors:  G Matthews; D R Davies; P J Holley
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention.

Authors:  R Parasuraman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Visual sustained attention: image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time.

Authors:  K H Nuechterlein; R Parasuraman; Q Jiang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; David N Brunelli; Joshua Rubinstein; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.