PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is complicated with heart failure (HF); however, the reason for this is not well understood. Craniofacial anatomic risk factors may contribute to OSA pathogenesis in HF patients. However, there are no data about cephalometric findings among OSA patients with HF. METHODS: Consecutive patients with HF and OSA (defined as total apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15/h) were enrolled. As controls, OSA patients without HF but matching the test group in age, BMI, and obstructive AHI were also enrolled. RESULTS: Overall, 17 OSA patients with HF and 34 OSA patients without HF were compared. There are no significant differences in the characteristics or polysomnographic parameters between 2 groups. In the cephalometric findings, compared with patients without HF, patients with HF showed a significantly greater angle between the line SN to point "A" (SNA) and a longer inferior airway space and greater airway area. However, the tongue area of patients with HF was more than those without HF. CONCLUSIONS: The craniofacial structures of OSA patients with HF were different from those without HF. OSA patients with HF had an upper airway anatomy that is more likely to collapse when sleeping while recumbent, despite having a larger airway space.
PURPOSE:Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is complicated with heart failure (HF); however, the reason for this is not well understood. Craniofacial anatomic risk factors may contribute to OSA pathogenesis in HF patients. However, there are no data about cephalometric findings among OSA patients with HF. METHODS: Consecutive patients with HF and OSA (defined as total apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15/h) were enrolled. As controls, OSA patients without HF but matching the test group in age, BMI, and obstructive AHI were also enrolled. RESULTS: Overall, 17 OSA patients with HF and 34 OSA patients without HF were compared. There are no significant differences in the characteristics or polysomnographic parameters between 2 groups. In the cephalometric findings, compared with patients without HF, patients with HF showed a significantly greater angle between the line SN to point "A" (SNA) and a longer inferior airway space and greater airway area. However, the tongue area of patients with HF was more than those without HF. CONCLUSIONS: The craniofacial structures of OSA patients with HF were different from those without HF. OSA patients with HF had an upper airway anatomy that is more likely to collapse when sleeping while recumbent, despite having a larger airway space.
Authors: Michael Arzt; Terry Young; Laurel Finn; James B Skatrud; Clodagh M Ryan; Gary E Newton; Susanna Mak; John D Parker; John S Floras; T Douglas Bradley Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-09-18
Authors: Bruno Caldin da Silva; Takatoshi Kasai; Fernando Morgadinho Coelho; Roberto Zatz; Rosilene M Elias Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2018-01-22