Literature DB >> 24213204

On earthquake prediction in Japan.

Seiya Uyeda1.   

Abstract

Japan's National Project for Earthquake Prediction has been conducted since 1965 without success. An earthquake prediction should be a short-term prediction based on observable physical phenomena or precursors. The main reason of no success is the failure to capture precursors. Most of the financial resources and manpower of the National Project have been devoted to strengthening the seismographs networks, which are not generally effective for detecting precursors since many of precursors are non-seismic. The precursor research has never been supported appropriately because the project has always been run by a group of seismologists who, in the present author's view, are mainly interested in securing funds for seismology - on pretense of prediction. After the 1995 Kobe disaster, the project decided to give up short-term prediction and this decision has been further fortified by the 2011 M9 Tohoku Mega-quake. On top of the National Project, there are other government projects, not formally but vaguely related to earthquake prediction, that consume many orders of magnitude more funds. They are also un-interested in short-term prediction. Financially, they are giants and the National Project is a dwarf. Thus, in Japan now, there is practically no support for short-term prediction research. Recently, however, substantial progress has been made in real short-term prediction by scientists of diverse disciplines. Some promising signs are also arising even from cooperation with private sectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24213204      PMCID: PMC3865355          DOI: 10.2183/pjab.89.391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci        ISSN: 0386-2208            Impact factor:   3.493


  9 in total

1.  Electric and magnetic phenomena observed before the volcano-seismic activity in 2000 in the Izu Island Region, Japan.

Authors:  S Uyeda; M Hayakawa; T Nagao; O Molchanov; K Hattori; Y Orihara; K Gotoh; Y Akinaga; H Tanaka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 M(w) 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.

Authors:  Aitaro Kato; Kazushige Obara; Toshihiro Igarashi; Hiroshi Tsuruoka; Shigeki Nakagawa; Naoshi Hirata
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Italy puts seismology in the dock.

Authors:  Nicola Nosengo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Space-time clustering and correlations of major earthquakes.

Authors:  James R Holliday; John B Rundle; Donald L Turcotte; William Klein; Kristy F Tiampo; Andrea Donnellan
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  The parkfield, california, earthquake prediction experiment.

Authors:  W H Bakun; A G Lindh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Earthquake prediction: a physical basis.

Authors:  C H Scholz; L R Sykes; Y P Aggarwal
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Minimum of the order parameter fluctuations of seismicity before major earthquakes in Japan.

Authors:  Nicholas V Sarlis; Efthimios S Skordas; Panayiotis A Varotsos; Toshiyasu Nagao; Masashi Kamogawa; Haruo Tanaka; Seiya Uyeda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Preseismic anomalous telluric current signals observed in Kozu-shima Island, Japan.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Orihara; Masashi Kamogawa; Toshiyasu Nagao; Seiya Uyeda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power stations of TEPCO--outline & lessons learned.

Authors:  Shun-ichi Tanaka
Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.493

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Statistical and Criticality Analysis of the Lower Ionosphere Prior to the 30 October 2020 Samos (Greece) Earthquake (M6.9), Based on VLF Electromagnetic Propagation Data as Recorded by a New VLF/LF Receiver Installed in Athens (Greece).

Authors:  Dimitrios Z Politis; Stelios M Potirakis; Yiannis F Contoyiannis; Sagardweep Biswas; Sudipta Sasmal; Masashi Hayakawa
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.524

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.