| Literature DB >> 24212844 |
Jamaludin Mohamed1, Saw Wuan Shing, Muhd Hanis Md Idris, Siti Balkis Budin, Satirah Zainalabidin.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of aqueous extracts of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L. UKMR-2) against red blood cell (RBC) membrane oxidative stress in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24212844 PMCID: PMC3798552 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2013(10)11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Body weight, blood glucose, and food and water intake.
| Group N | Group NR | Group D | Group DR | |
| 318.63±10.40 | 328.88±10.42 | 233.44±15.28ab | 206.40±14.58ab | |
| 6.8±0.80 | 6.1±0.60 | 26.85±1.33ab | 19.32±1.48abc | |
| 4.07±0.15 | 6.14±0.75 | 14.73±0.40ab | 13.45±0.60ab | |
| 8.73±2.09 | 8.95±0.90 | 44.52±2.55ab | 43.21±2.35ab |
Values are expressed as the mean±SEM (n = 8 per group).
indicates a significant difference compared with group N (p<0.05).
indicates a significant difference compared with group NR (p<0.05).
indicates a significant difference compared with group D (p<0.05).
Figure 1RBC membrane MDA level among control group (N), roselle-treated control group (NR), diabetic group (D), and roselle-treated diabetic group (DR). Data values are expressed as mean±SEM.
Figure 2RBC membrane PC level among control group (N), roselle-treated control group (NR), diabetic group (D), and roselle-treated diabetic group (DR). Data values are expressed as mean±SEM.
Figure 3RBC membrane SOD enzyme activity among control group (N), roselle-treated control group (NR), diabetic group (D), and roselle-treated diabetic group (DR). Data values are expressed as mean±SEM.
Values of osmotic fragility for the control group (N) and the STZ-induced diabetes group (D) following 28 days of treatment with aqueous extracts of roselle.
| NaCl (%) | Group N | Group NR | Group D | Group DR |
| 0.85 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.55 | 1.41±0.33 | 1.31±0.34 | 3.96±2.44 | 1.20±0.34 |
| 0.45 | 22.91±6.88 | 37.55±6.66 | 37.65±7.44 | 40.05±7.03 |
| 0.30 | 92.51±1.84 | 82.75±3.05 | 94.44±0.98 | 89.53±1.98 |
| 0.00 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Values are expressed as the mean±SEM.
indicates a significant difference compared with group N (p<0.05).
Figure 4RBC morphology of (A) control rat, (B) roselle-treated control rat, (C) diabetic rat, and (D) roselle-treated diabetic rat under magnification of 1000x with a light microscope. Data values are expressed as mean±SEM.