| Literature DB >> 24212182 |
Luis Vitetta1, Anthony W Linnane, Glenda C Gobe.
Abstract
A host of compounds are retained in the body of uremic patients, as a consequence of progressive renal failure. Hundreds of compounds have been reported to be retention solutes and many have been proven to have adverse biological activity, and recognized as uremic toxins. The major mechanistic overview considered to contribute to uremic toxin overload implicates glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity, hexosamine, increased polyol pathway activity and the accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). Until recently, the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and its associated micro-biometabolome was a neglected factor in chronic disease development. A systematic underestimation has been to undervalue the contribution of GIT dysbiosis (a gut barrier-associated abnormality) whereby low-level pro-inflammatory processes contribute to chronic kidney disease (CKD) development. Gut dysbiosis provides a plausible clue to the origin of systemic uremic toxin loads encountered in clinical practice and may explain the increasing occurrence of CKD. In this review, we further expand a hypothesis that posits that environmentally triggered and maintained microbiome perturbations drive GIT dysbiosis with resultant uremia. These subtle adaptation responses by the GIT microbiome can be significantly influenced by probiotics with specific metabolic properties, thereby reducing uremic toxins in the gut. The benefit translates to a useful clinical treatment approach for patients diagnosed with CKD. Furthermore, the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in different anatomical locales is highlighted as a positive process. Production of ROS in the GIT by the epithelial lining and the commensal microbe cohort is a regulated process, leading to the formation of hydrogen peroxide which acts as an essential second messenger required for normal cellular homeostasis and physiological function. Whilst this critical review has focused on end-stage CKD (type 5), our aim was to build a plausible hypothesis for the administration of probiotics with or without prebiotics for the early treatment of kidney disease. We postulate that targeting healthy ROS production in the gut with probiotics may be more beneficial than any systemic antioxidant therapy (that is proposed to nullify ROS) for the prevention of kidney disease progression. The study and understanding of health-promoting probiotic bacteria is in its infancy; it is complex and intellectually and experimentally challenging.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24212182 PMCID: PMC3847713 DOI: 10.3390/toxins5112042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Clinical trials investigating the administration of probiotics and prebiotics in chronic kidney disease (adopted and modified from Vitetta and Gobe [2]).
| Clinical Trial Type [Reference] | Participant Type Location | Clinical Trial Results |
|---|---|---|
| Open label pilot study [ | Haemodialysis | Probiotic treatment was effective in:
↓serum dimethylamine from 224 ± 47 to 154 ± 47 μg/dL ( ↓nitrosodimethylamine 178 ± 67 ng/Kg (untreated) to 83 ± 49 ng/Kg (after treatment) ( modified metabolic actions of small bowel bacterial overgrowth ↓ |
| Prospective pilot DBRPC crossover trial [ | CKD stages 3 and 4 | Probiotic treatment: ↓ BUN (29 patients (63%, ↓Creatinine (20 patients (43%, ↓Uric acid (15 patients (33%, subjects expressed overall improvement in QoL (86%, |
| Prospective pilot DBRPC crossover trial [ | CKD stages 3 and 4 |
↓BUN [probiotic (-2.93 mmol/L ↓mean uric acid during probiotic period (24.70 μmol/L) no significant change serum creatinine no gastrointestinal/infectious complications improved QoL |
| Single centre, non-randomized, open-label phase I/II study [ | Haemodialysis |
20% ↓p-cresyl sulfate serum concentrations at 4 weeks (intention to treat, ↓p-cresyl sulfate generation rates were reduced ( no significant changes in indoxyl sulfate generation rates/serum concentrations |
| Open label single arm study [ | Haemodialysis | Pretreatment observation period:
haemodialysis patients with a high serum p-cresol level tended to have hard stools with difficulty in defecation; stool quantity increased significantly hard, muddy or soft stools tended to be replaced by normal ones significant ↓serum p-cresol |
Notes: BUN: blood-urea-nitrogen; CFU: Colony-Forming Units; HD: Hemodialysis; QoL: Quality of Life. SYN: Synbiotic (probiotic + prebiotic); DBRPC: Double Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled; b.i.d.: twice per day; t.i.d.: three times per day.