Literature DB >> 24211470

Public health program planning logic model for community engaged type 2 diabetes management and prevention.

Joseph F West1.   

Abstract

Diabetes remains a growing epidemic with widening health inequity gaps in disease management, self-management knowledge, access to care and outcomes. Yet there is a paucity of evaluation tools for community engaged interventions aimed at closing the gaps and improving health. The Guide to Community Preventive Services (the Community Guide) developed by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (the Task Force) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends two healthcare system level interventions, case management interventions and disease management programs, to improve glycemic control. However, as a public health resource guide for diabetes interventions a model for community engagement is a glaringly absent component of the Community Guide recommendations. In large part there are few evidence-based interventions featuring community engagement as a practice and system-level focus of chronic disease and Type 2 diabetes management. The central argument presented in this paper is that the absence of these types of interventions is due to the lack of tools for modeling and evaluating such interventions, especially among disparate and poor populations. A conceptual model emphasizing action-oriented micro-level community engagement is needed to complement the Community Guide and serve as the basis for testing and evaluation of these kinds of interventions. A unique logic model advancing the Community Guide diabetes recommendations toward measureable and sustainable community engagement for improved Type 2 diabetes outcomes is presented.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case management; Community health planning; Community-based participatory research; Community–institutional relations; Diabetes mellitus; Disease management; Health promotion; Healthy People 2020; Logic models; Planning techniques

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24211470     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  6 in total

1.  Systematic Evaluation of a Provincial Initiative to Improve Transition to Home Dialysis Therapies.

Authors:  Alice Wang; Linda Turnbull; Janet Williams; Sarah Thomas; Sushila Saunders; Adeera Levin; Ognjenka Djurdjev; Michael Copland; Suneet Singh; Juliya Hemmett
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2020-08-28

2.  The perceptions and perspectives of patients and health care providers on chronic diseases management in rural South Africa: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eric Maimela; Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden; Marianne Alberts; Sewela E P Modjadji; Herman Meulemans; Jesicca Fraeyman; Hilde Bastiaens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Implementation of a consumer-focused eHealth intervention for people with moderate-to-high cardiovascular disease risk: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation.

Authors:  Genevieve M Coorey; Lis Neubeck; Timothy Usherwood; David Peiris; Sharon Parker; Annie Y S Lau; Clara Chow; Kathryn Panaretto; Mark Harris; Nicholas Zwar; Julie Redfern
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  An Evaluation of a Train-the-Trainer Workshop for Social Service Workers to Develop Community-Based Family Interventions.

Authors:  Agnes Y Lai; Sunita M Stewart; Moses W Mui; Alice Wan; Carol Yew; Tai Hing Lam; Sophia S Chan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-06-30

5.  Taking an integrated knowledge translation approach in research to develop the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: an observational study.

Authors:  Janet Jull; Ian D Graham; Elizabeth Kristjansson; David Moher; Jennifer Petkovic; Manosila Yoganathan; Peter Tugwell; Vivian A Welch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Evaluating an oral health programme for the prevention of dental decay among school-aged children in China: protocol for a mixed-methods study based on the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  Lidan Wang; Hueiming Liu; Li Wang; Yanqun Zhang; Wei Guo; Peilin Wu; Xiangxiang Chang; Li Wang; Wenhua Xu; Linhai Zhao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.006

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.