Literature DB >> 24210560

Vasectomy reversal outcomes among patients with vasal obstructive intervals greater than 10 years.

Ethan D Grober1, Edward Karpman2, Majid Fanipour3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the vasectomy reversal (VR) outcomes specifically among patients with vasal obstructive intervals (VOIs) of >10 years. The VOI has been shown to be a significant predictor of outcome after VR. Although no strict cutoff exists, couples have frequently been discouraged from considering a VR strictly according to the interval from vasectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2006 to 2011, all consecutive VRs performed by 2 fellowship-trained microsurgeons were analyzed. The patients were stratified into 4 categories according to the duration of the VOI: <10, 10-15, >15-20, and >20 years. The postoperative semen parameters, patency rates, and pregnancy outcomes were compared among the 4 groups.
RESULTS: Of 535 consecutive VRs, 177 patients (33%) had a VOI of >10 years. The couple characteristics, type of VR required, postoperative semen quality, and patency and pregnancy rates among the 4 groups were analyzed. The men with longer VOIs were older (P <.001) and had older female partners (P = .006). Although the VOI influenced the type of reversal performed, favorable semen concentrations (average >20 million/mL in all groups) and patency (average >90%) and pregnancy rates (range 24%-39%) were achieved in men with a VOI >10 years.
CONCLUSION: Although the interval since vasectomy has a significant effect on the type of VR required, provided a surgeon is proficient in both microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy, favorable semen parameters and patency and pregnancy rates can be achieved in men with a VOI >10 years. Couples should not be discouraged from considering VR simply according to the VOI.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210560     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Predictors of success after bilateral epididymovasostomy performed during vasectomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Sirpi Nackeeran; Udi Blankstein; Joshua T White; Ethan Grober; Sheldon H Marks; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Vasoepididymostomy: an insight into current practice patterns.

Authors:  Ujval S Pathak; Adithya Balasubramanian; Jonathan A Beilan; Mohit Butaney; Alexander J Tatem; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Microsurgical Management of Male Infertility: Compelling Evidence That Collaboration with Qualified Male Reproductive Urologists Enhances Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Marinaro; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Successful unilateral vasectomy reversal in a lion (Panthera leo).

Authors:  Marcelo Marconi; José Manuel de la Torre; Cristian Palma; Hector Gallegos; Evelyn Soto; Sebastián Celis; Camila de la Torre; Carolina Ortiz; Alberto Duarte; Ignacio Idalsoaga
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 5.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.