Literature DB >> 24210482

Effects of feed additives on rumen and blood profiles during a starch and fructose challenge.

H M Golder1, P Celi2, A R Rabiee3, I J Lean3.   

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of feed additives on the risk of ruminal acidosis in Holstein heifers (n = 40) fed starch and fructose in a challenge study. Heifers were randomly allocated to feed additive groups (n = 8 heifers/group): (1) control (no additives); (2) virginiamycin (VM); (3) monensin + tylosin (MT); (4) monensin + live yeast (MLY); and (5) sodium bicarbonate + magnesium oxide (BUF). Heifers were fed 2.5% of body weight (BW) dry matter intake (DMI) per day of a total mixed ration (62:38 forage:concentrate) and feed additives for a 20-d adaptation period. Fructose (0.1% of BW/d) was included for the last 10d of the adaptation period. On d 21, heifers were fed to target a DMI of 1.0% of BW of wheat, fructose at 0.2% of BW, and their feed additives. Rumen fluid samples obtained by stomach tube and blood samples were collected weekly as well as during a 3.6-h period on challenge day (d 21). Virginiamycin and BUF groups maintained a consistently high DMI across the 20-d adaptation period. The MLY heifers had low DMI of the challenge ration. Average daily gain and feed conversion ratio were not affected by feed additives. All rumen and plasma measures changed weekly over adaptation and over the challenge sampling period with the exception of rumen total lactate and histamine concentrations, plasma oxidative stress index, and ceruloplasmin. Substantial within- and between-group variation was observed in rumen and plasma profiles at challenge sampling. No significant group changes were observed in rumen total volatile fatty acids, propionate, acetate-to-propionate ratio, isobutyrate, caproate, isovalerate, total lactate, d- and l-lactate, and pH measures on challenge day. Acetate concentration was increased in the BUF and control groups on challenge day. Butyrate concentration was lower in the MLY and MT groups compared with other groups at challenge. Valerate concentrations were lowest in the control, VM, and BUF groups and lactate concentrations were numerically lower in the MLY, VM, and BUF groups. Total lactate concentrations were >10mM for each group throughout the challenge. Ammonia concentrations were lower in the MLY and MT groups. Histamine concentrations were decreased in MLY and increased in the VM and BUF groups. Plasma oxidative stress measures were not influenced by feed additives weekly or on challenge day, except for an increase in biological antioxidant potential in the control, VM, and MT groups on challenge day. Despite the large within-animal variation, all feed additives modified rumen function and may influence the risk of acidosis by different mechanisms; however, none stabilized the rumen in all heifers.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acidosis; feed additive; fructose; lactic acid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210482     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Ruminal acidosis in a 21-month-old Holstein heifer.

Authors:  Helen M Golder; Pietro Celi; Ian J Lean
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Use of dicarboxylic acids and polyphenols to attenuate reticular pH drop and acute phase response in dairy heifers fed a high grain diet.

Authors:  Roberta De Nardi; Giorgio Marchesini; Jan C Plaizier; Shucong Li; Ehsan Khafipour; Rebecca Ricci; Igino Andrighetto; Severino Segato
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Effects of Phytoecdysteroids (PEDS) Extracted from Cyanotis arachnoidea on Rumen Fermentation, Enzyme Activity and Microbial Efficiency in a Continuous-Culture System.

Authors:  Deyong Li; Yawei Zhang; Zhenliang Cui; Liwen He; Wanbao Chen; Qingxiang Meng; Liping Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genetic Markers Are Associated with the Ruminal Microbiome and Metabolome in Grain and Sugar Challenged Dairy Heifers.

Authors:  Helen M Golder; Jennifer M Thomson; Stuart E Denman; Chris S McSweeney; Ian J Lean
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Energy partitioning in cattle fed diets based on tropical forage with the inclusion of antibiotic additives.

Authors:  Marcelina Pereira da Fonseca; Ana Luiza da Costa Cruz Borges; Pedro Henrique de Araujo Carvalho; Ricardo Reis E Silva; Lúcio Carlos Gonçãlves; Iran Borges; Helena Ferreira Lage; Alexandre Lima Ferreira; Eloísa Oliveira Simões Saliba; Diogo Gonzaga Jayme; Joana Ribeiro da Glória; Décio Souza Graça; Rodrigo Melo Meneses; Antônio Último de Carvalho; Elias Jorge Facury Filho; Arthur Alves Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.