Literature DB >> 24210334

Hemodynamic impact and outcome of permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Simon Biner1, Yoav Michowitz2, Eran Leshem-Rubinow1, Yan Topilsky1, Eyal Ben-Assa1, Jason Shimiaie1, Shmuel Banai1, Gad Keren1, Arie Steinvil1, Ariel Finkelstein1.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) frequently requires postprocedural permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. We evaluated clinical and hemodynamic impact of PPM after TAVI. Clinical and echocardiographic data were retrospectively analyzed in 230 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI and echocardiography at baseline and after 6 months. Echocardiographic parameters included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular (LV) stroke volume, early mitral velocity/annulus velocity ratio (E/e'), right ventricular index of myocardial performance, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP), and aortic, mitral, and tricuspid regurgitation grades. Clinical outcomes included 2-year survival and cardiovascular and PPM-related event-free survival. The Medtronic CoreValve and Edwards Sapien prosthesis were used in 201 and 29 patients, respectively. PPM was required in 58 patients (25.4%). Two-year and event-free survival rates were similar between patients with and without PPM. At 6 months, patients with PPM demonstrated attenuated improvement in LVEF (-0.9 ± 8.7% vs 2.3 ± 10.8%, respectively, p = 0.03) and LV stroke volume (-2 ± 16 vs 4 ± 10 ml/m(2), respectively, p = 0.015), a trend toward smaller reduction in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (-1 ± 12 vs -6 ± 10 mm Hg, respectively, p = 0.09), and deterioration of right ventricular index of myocardial performance (-3 ± 17% vs 5 ± 26%, respectively, p = 0.05). The differences in post-TAVI aortic, mitral, and tricuspid regurgitation grades were insignificant. In conclusion, PPM implantation after TAVI is associated with reduced LVEF and impaired LV unloading. However, this unfavorable hemodynamic response does not affect the 2-year clinical outcome. The maintenance of clinical benefit appears to be driven by TAVI-related recovery of LV and right ventricular performance that mitigates unfavorable impact of PPM.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210334     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

Review 1.  Permanent pacemaker insertion in patients with conduction abnormalities post transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Amit Nanda; Samuel Latham; Issa Pour-Ghaz; William Paul Skelton; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

2.  Effect of Mechanically Expanded vs Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Mortality and Major Adverse Clinical Events in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ted E Feldman; Michael J Reardon; Vivek Rajagopal; Raj R Makkar; Tanvir K Bajwa; Neal S Kleiman; Axel Linke; Dean J Kereiakes; Ron Waksman; Vinod H Thourani; Robert C Stoler; Gregory J Mishkel; David G Rizik; Vijay S Iyer; Thomas G Gleason; Didier Tchétché; Joshua D Rovin; Maurice Buchbinder; Ian T Meredith; Matthias Götberg; Henrik Bjursten; Christopher Meduri; Michael H Salinger; Dominic J Allocco; Keith D Dawkins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  In-hospital mortality in propensity-score matched low-risk patients undergoing routine isolated surgical or transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in 2014 in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Frerker; Kurt Bestehorn; Michael Schlüter; Maike Bestehorn; Christian W Hamm; Helge Möllmann; Hugo A Katus; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shun Xu; Enrui Zhang; Zhiyong Qian; Jinyu Sun; Fengwei Zou; Yao Wang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  Impact of postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziwei Xi; Tong Liu; Jing Liang; Yu-Jie Zhou; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Safety and efficacy of self-expandable Evolut R vs. balloon-expandable Sapien 3 valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenglin He; Lang Xiao; Junli Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Long-term clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Zito; Giuseppe Princi; Marco Lombardi; Domenico D'Amario; Rocco Vergallo; Cristina Aurigemma; Enrico Romagnoli; Gemma Pelargonio; Piergiorgio Bruno; Carlo Trani; Francesco Burzotta; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.486

8.  Association of Clinical and Economic Outcomes With Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Talal Aljabbary; Feng Qiu; Shannon Masih; Jiming Fang; Gabby Elbaz-Greener; Peter C Austin; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Dennis T Ko; Sheldon Singh; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-05-18

9.  [Influence of deep implantation on conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation].

Authors:  Mohammed Saad; Yannic Klaus; Paul Buhse; Thomas Puehler; Georg Lutter; Hatim Seoudy; Derk Frank
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2021-07-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.