Literature DB >> 24210148

Operative report teaching and synoptic operative reports: a national survey of surgical program directors.

Genevieve B Melton1, Nora E Burkart2, Nathan G Frey3, Jeffrey G Chipman4, David A Rothenberger4, Selwyn M Vickers4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although operative report documentation (ORD) is an essential skill for surgeons and is evolving with electronic health records (EHRs), little is known about current ORD teaching in surgical training. STUDY
DESIGN: An electronic survey was sent out in January 2012 to all 1,096 ACGME surgical program directors that assessed characteristics of training programs, EHR adoption, ORD education, synoptic or templated report usage for ORD, and attitudes and opinions about ORD education and electronic tools for ORD. Content thematic analysis of qualitative responses was performed iteratively until reaching saturation.
RESULTS: Overall, 441 program directors (40%; 17.9 ± 8.8 years in practice) responded from university-affiliated (383 [87%]), community/private (44 [10%]), and military (14 [3%]) programs. Although most (n = 295 [67%]) consider ORD teaching a priority, only 76 (17%) programs provide ORD instruction. Program directors formally trained in ORD were more likely to offer ORD instruction (61% vs 11%; p < 0.0001), as were obstetrics/gynecology programs (obstetrics/gynecology 35% vs surgery 18%, neurosurgery 16%, ophthalmology 14%, orthopaedics 14%; p < 0.05 each). Although EHR adoption and electronically available operative reports were common (91%), besides ophthalmology (31%) and obstetrics/gynecology (30%) programs, ORD with synoptic reporting was used in only 18% of programs overall. Program directors perceived major barriers to ORD instruction and synoptic reporting for ORD.
CONCLUSIONS: Although most program directors consider ORD teaching an educational priority, incongruence exists between its perceived value and its adoption into surgical training. Operative report documentation with synoptic reporting is currently not common in most surgical subspecialties.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210148     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  3 in total

1.  Completeness of operative reports for rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Arielle E Kanters; Joceline V Vu; Ari D Schuman; Inga Van Wieren; Ashley Duby; Karin M Hardiman; Samantha K Hendren
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Analyzing Operative Note Structure in Development of a Section Header Resource.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Yan Wang; Elliot Arsoniadis; Serguei V S Pakhomov; Terrence J Adam; Mary R Kwaan; David A Rothenberger; Elizabeth S Chen
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

3.  Implementation of a synoptic operative note for abdominal wall hernia repair: a statewide pilot evaluating completeness and communication of intraoperative details.

Authors:  Lia D Delaney; Kerry M Lindquist; Ryan Howard; Anne P Ehlers; C Ann Vitous; Michael Englesbe; Justin B Dimick; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.453

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.