Literature DB >> 24209431

Concordance between vacuum assisted biopsy and postoperative histology: implications for the proposed Low Risk DCIS Trial (LORIS).

S Soumian1, E T Verghese, M Booth, N Sharma, S Chaudhri, S Bradley, S Umranikar, R A Millican-Slater, A M Hanby, A Francis.   

Abstract

AIM: The recent Breast Cancer Screening Review has estimated that for one life saved three patients are overtreated. The dramatic increase in the diagnosis of Ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) has not lead to the expected decrease in the incidence of invasive cancer. It is not clear if all DCIS progress to invasive cancer if untreated. The Low Risk DCIS Trial (LORIS) intends to compare the current treatment of low risk DCIS i.e. surgery, with active monitoring. For effective implementation, concordance between diagnostic biopsy using large volume vacuum assisted biopsy (VAB) and excision histology is vital. A two-centre UK audit was done to assess concordance in patients diagnosed with low grade DCIS diagnosed using VAB.
METHODS: Data of DCIS diagnosed with VAB from year 2001-2010 in University Hospital Birmingham and Leeds Teaching Hospitals was retrospectively collected and concordance between diagnostic and excision histology was assessed. Low Grade DCIS diagnoses were further evaluated retrospectively with regard to their eligibility for LORIS.
RESULTS: Of 225 DCIS diagnoses 128 (57%) were high grade, 66 (29%) intermediate grade and 31 (14%) low grade. Overall 18% were upgraded to invasive cancer. The upgrade rate to invasive cancer for high grade was 23% and for low grade DCIS was 10%. In the low grade group eligible for LORIS, there were no upgrades to invasive cancer.
CONCLUSION: The upgrade rates to invasive cancer are comparable to series published in literature. The concordance for the low risk DCIS with zero upgrade to invasive cancer supports the stringent LORIS eligibility criteria for trial selection.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Concordance; Ductal carcinoma in-situ; Mammotome; Vacuum assisted biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24209431     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  15 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Do LORIS Trial Eligibility Criteria Identify a Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patient Population at Low Risk of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Michelle Stempel; Hope Rosenfeld; Anne Eaton; Kimberly J Van Zee; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Active surveillance of women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on core needle biopsy may spare many women potentially unnecessary surgery, but at the risk of undertreatment for a minority: 10-year surgical outcomes of 114 consecutive cases from a single center.

Authors:  Gelareh Farshid; Suzanne Edwards; James Kollias; Peter Grantley Gill
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Women with Low-Risk DCIS Eligible for the LORIS Trial After Complete Surgical Excision: How Low Is Their Risk After Standard Therapy?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Cristina Olcese; Sujata Patil; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Surgical Upstaging Rates for Vacuum Assisted Biopsy Proven DCIS: Implications for Active Surveillance Trials.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; Marc D Ryser; Ann H Partridge; Alastair M Thompson; Jeremy S Thomas; Jelle Wesseling; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  A comparison of the risks of in-breast recurrence after a diagnosis of dcis or early invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  S A Narod; E Rakovitch
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

Authors:  Tawakalitu O Oseni; Barbara L Smith; Constance D Lehman; Charmi A Vijapura; Niveditha Pinnamaneni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Koji Takada; Shinichiro Kashiwagi; Yuka Asano; Wataru Goto; Tamami Morisaki; Katsuyuki Takahashi; Hisakazu Fujita; Tsutomu Takashima; Shuhei Tomita; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A prediction model for underestimation of invasive breast cancer after a biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: based on 2892 biopsies and 589 invasive cancers.

Authors:  Claudia J C Meurs; Joost van Rosmalen; Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers; Bert P M Ter Braak; Linda de Munck; Sabine Siesling; Pieter J Westenend
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma in situ: Residual Microcalcifications and Intraoperative Findings.

Authors:  Benedict Krischer; Serafino Forte; Gad Singer; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Cornelia Leo
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.