| Literature DB >> 24209387 |
Anselmo Caricato, Alessandra Tersali, Sara Pitoni, Chiara De Waure, Claudio Sandroni, Maria Grazia Bocci, Maria Giuseppina Annetta, Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Massimo Antonelli.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is essential for patient care in an ICU but may represent a cause of cerebral secondary injury. Ketamine has been historically contraindicated for its use in head injury patients, since an increase of intracranial pressure (ICP) was reported; nevertheless, its use was recently suggested in neurosurgical patients. In this prospective observational study we investigated the effect of ETS on ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), jugular oxygen saturation (SjO2) and cerebral blood flow velocity (mVMCA) before and after the administration of ketamine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24209387 PMCID: PMC4056626 DOI: 10.1186/cc13097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Study protocol
| T1 | Baseline |
| T2 | Immediately before ETS |
| T3 | Immediately after ETS |
| T4 | 5 minutes after ETS |
| T5 | 10 minutes after ETS |
Scoring of cough strength[31]
| 1 | Agitation, distress, prolonged coughing |
| 2 | Coughs, distressed, rapid recovery |
| 3 | Coughs, not distressed |
| 4 | No cough |
Figure 1Ketamine prevented any significant increase of mean arterial pressure (MAP) after endotracheal suctioning. Statistical significance in comparison with T1 is shown. *P <0.05; **P <0.01.
Figure 2No significant difference in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was observed during the study in both groups.
Figure 3Differences between control and intervention in intracranial pressure (ICP) during the study are shown. Statistical significance in comparison with T1 is shown. *P <0.05; **P <0.01.
Figure 4A significant increase of blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (mV MCA) was observed in the control group. Statistical significance in comparison with T1 is shown. *P <0.05.
Figure 5SjO2 increased after endotracheal suctioning (ETS) in both groups. In the control group a significant difference was observed. Statistical significance in comparison with T1 is shown. *P <0.05.
Figure 6Cough score evaluated after endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is shown [31]. Each bar corresponds to the cough score of each patient.