Literature DB >> 24206760

Metric-driven harm: an exploration of unintended consequences of performance measurement.

Betty Rambur1, Carol Vallett, Judith A Cohen, Jill Mattuck Tarule.   

Abstract

Performance measurement is an increasingly common element of the US health care system. Typically a proxy for high quality outcomes, there has been little systematic investigation of the potential negative unintended consequences of performance metrics, including metric-driven harm. This case study details an incidence of post-surgical metric-driven harm and offers Smith's 1995 work and a patient centered, context sensitive metric model for potential adoption by nurse researchers and clinicians. Implications for further research are discussed.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metric-driven harm; Performance measurement; Public reporting of health care outcomes; Quality improvement; Unintended consequences

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24206760     DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Nurs Res        ISSN: 0897-1897            Impact factor:   2.257


  2 in total

Review 1.  Incentivizing performance in health care: a rapid review, typology and qualitative study of unintended consequences.

Authors:  Xinyu Li; Jenna M Evans
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing.

Authors:  Katherine Pollard; Sue Horrocks; Lorna Duncan; Christina Petsoulas; Pauline Allen; Ailsa Cameron; Jane Cook; Emma Gibbard; Lizanne Harland; Pete Husband; Geoff Loydon; Ruth McDonald; Lesley Wye; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2019-10-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.