BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Variceal bleeding is a frequent and life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) oesophagography as an alternative to endoscopy for screening oesophageal varices (EVs) and predicting bleeding risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 137 cirrhotic patients underwent MDCT followed by endoscopy and EVs were graded independently. The screening ability of CT for EV was evaluated by comparing the grades of EV at CT and at endoscopy. Prediction of bleeding risk by CT was determined by correlating the CT variceal grades, diameters and palisade vein dilatation with the endoscopic red colour (RC) sign. Extra-oesophageal findings were assessed by CT. Patients' acceptance for both examinations were compared. RESULTS: At endoscopy, 47 (34%) patients had grade 0 EV, 52 (38%) patients had grade 1 EV, 29 (21%) patients had grade 2 EV and nine (7%) patients had grade 3 EV. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of CT oesophagography for defining EV in all grades were 99%, 98%, 99%, 98% and 99%, respectively. The MDCT variceal grades, diameters and palisade vein dilatation were correlated with the severity of the RC sign. Important extra-oesophageal findings were determined by CT only. The acceptance of patients for CT oesophagography was significantly more than that for endoscopy (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: MDCT is a reliable, preliminary or adjunctive method that can be used for routine screening for EVs and the prediction of variceal bleeding.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Variceal bleeding is a frequent and life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) oesophagography as an alternative to endoscopy for screening oesophageal varices (EVs) and predicting bleeding risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 137 cirrhotic patients underwent MDCT followed by endoscopy and EVs were graded independently. The screening ability of CT for EV was evaluated by comparing the grades of EV at CT and at endoscopy. Prediction of bleeding risk by CT was determined by correlating the CT variceal grades, diameters and palisade vein dilatation with the endoscopic red colour (RC) sign. Extra-oesophageal findings were assessed by CT. Patients' acceptance for both examinations were compared. RESULTS: At endoscopy, 47 (34%) patients had grade 0 EV, 52 (38%) patients had grade 1 EV, 29 (21%) patients had grade 2 EV and nine (7%) patients had grade 3 EV. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of CT oesophagography for defining EV in all grades were 99%, 98%, 99%, 98% and 99%, respectively. The MDCT variceal grades, diameters and palisade vein dilatation were correlated with the severity of the RC sign. Important extra-oesophageal findings were determined by CT only. The acceptance of patients for CT oesophagography was significantly more than that for endoscopy (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: MDCT is a reliable, preliminary or adjunctive method that can be used for routine screening for EVs and the prediction of variceal bleeding.
Authors: D Jothimani; S Danielraj; B Nallathambi; B Pandurangan; S Kalyanasundaram; K Subbiah; H Ramachandran; R Venugopal; D Dhas; M Rela Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2021-07-11 Impact factor: 2.350