| Literature DB >> 24205143 |
Chaomeng Dai1, Juan Zhang, Yalei Zhang, Xuefei Zhou, Shuguang Liu.
Abstract
A new molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) adsorbent for clofibric acid (CA) was prepared by a non-covalent protocol. Characterization of the obtained MIP was achieved by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and nitrogen sorption. Sorption experimental results showed that the MIP had excellent binding affinity for CA and the adsorption of CA by MIP was well described by pseudo-second-order model. Scatchard plot analysis revealed that two classes of binding sites were formed in the MIP with dissociation constants of 7.52 ± 0.46 mg L(-1) and 114 ± 4.2 mg L(-1), respectively. The selectivity of MIP demonstrated higher affinity for CA over competitive compound than that of non-imprinted polymers (NIP). The MIP synthesized was used to remove CA from spiked surface water and exhibited significant binding affinity towards CA in the presence of total dissolved solids (TDS). In addition, MIP reusability was demonstrated for at least 12 repeated cycles without significant loss in performance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24205143 PMCID: PMC3814990 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy of the MIP (a) and NIP (b).
Figure 2Adsorption kinetics of MIP and NIP for CA (mean ±SD, n = 3).
Kinetic parameters of the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order equations for CA adsorption onto the MIP and NIP.
| Adsorbents | Pseudo-first-order | Pseudo-second-order | |||||
| k1 (min−1) | qe (mg g−1) | R2 | k2 (g mg−1 min−1) | qe (mg g−1) |
| R2 | |
| MIP | 0.0478±0.0005 | 121.7±7.6 | 0.935 | 0.005±0.002 | 123.5±10.2 | 76.3±4.1 | 0.9996 |
| NIP | 0.0639±0.0007 | 66.1±3.9 | 0.958 | 0.0041±0.001 | 68.9±6.8 | 19.6±1.6 | 0.9992 |
Figure 3Adsorption isotherms (a) and Scatchard plots (b) of MIP and NIP (mean ±SD, n = 3).
Figure 4Adsorption selectivity of MIP (mean ±SD, n = 3; *p<0.05).
Figure 5Effect of pH on the adsorption efficiency of CA by MIP (mean ±SD, n = 3).
Figure 6Effect of TDS on the removal efficiency of CA by different adsorbents (mean ±SD, n = 3).
Figure 7MIP regeneration cycles in spiked lake water.