| Literature DB >> 24205121 |
Lu Zhang1, Xiangyang Sun, Yun Tian, Xiaoqiang Gong.
Abstract
Peat mined from endangered wetland ecosystems is generally used as a component in soilless potting media in hortiEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24205121 PMCID: PMC3812227 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Linear regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on the physical characteristics of the growth media.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Characteristic | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| BD | Model | 9.17E-03 | 1 | 9.17E-03 | 113.02 | 0.0001*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| WHC | Model | 369.58 | 1 | 369.58 | 335.98 | 8.89E-06*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| TPS | Model | 251.40 | 1 | 251.40 | 32.26 | 0.0023** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| AP | Model | 15.75 | 1 | 15.75 | 61.68 | 0.0005*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| WHP | Model | 393.00 | 1 | 393.00 | 70.67 | 0.0004*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
BD = bulk density; WHC = water-holding capacity; TPS = total porosity; AP = aeration porosity; WHP = water-holding porosity.
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between the physical characteristics of the growth media and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Figure 1Effects of the CGW:P ratio on the physical characteristics of growth media.
The linear regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown. BD = bulk density; WHC = water-holding capacity; TPS = total porosity; AP = aeration porosity; WHP = water-holding porosity.
Figure 2Effects of the CGW:P ratio on the particle distribution at the start of the experiment.
The linear regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown.
Figure 3Effects of the CGW:P ratio on the chemical characteristics of growth media.
The linear regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown. EC = electrical conductivity (at 25°C); TOC = total organic carbon; TN = total Kjeldahl nitrogen; TP = total phosphorus; TK = total potassium.
Linear regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on the percentage of each particle size (in mm) for each growth medium at the start of the experiment.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Particle size | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| >2.0 | Model | 1158.06 | 1 | 1158.06 | 428.26 | 4.88E-06*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1.0–2.0 | Model | 27.96 | 1 | 27.96 | 82.42 | 2.71E-04*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.5–1.0 | Model | 77.51 | 1 | 77.51 | 192.99 | 3.47E-05*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.5–0.25 | Model | 78.34 | 1 | 78.34 | 579.35 | 2.31E-06*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.25–0.1 | Model | 72.99 | 1 | 72.99 | 1427.18 | 2.45E-07*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| <0.1 | Model | 6.47 | 1 | 6.47 | 780.35 | 1.10E-06*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between the percentage of each particle size (in mm) for each growth medium at the start of the experiment and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Linear regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on the percentage of each particle size (in mm) for each growth medium at the end of the experiment.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Particle size | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| >2.0 | Model | 38.98 | 1 | 38.98 | 604.38 | 2.08E-06*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1.0–2.0 | Model | 10.96 | 1 | 10.96 | 208.54 | 2.87E-05*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.5–1.0 | Model | 23.00 | 1 | 23.00 | 297.97 | 1.20E-05*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.5–0.25 | Model | 34.10 | 1 | 34.10 | 542.74 | 2.71E-06*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.25–0.1 | Model | 80.16 | 1 | 80.16 | 591.36 | 2.19E-06*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| <0.1 | Model | 21.30 | 1 | 21.30 | 92.27 | 0.0002*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between the percentage of each particle size (in mm) for each growth medium at the end of the experiment and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Figure 4Effects of the CGW:P ratio on the particle distribution at the end of the experiment.
The linear regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown.
Quadratic regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on the biomasses (fresh and dry) of shoots and roots of Calathea insignis.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Biomass | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Shoot fresh weight | Model | 3.23E03 | 2 | 1.62 | 11.82 | 0.0210* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Shoot dry weight | Model | 12.59 | 2 | 6.30 | 6.44 | 0.0560 n.s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Root fresh weight | Model | 5.38 | 2 | 2.69 | 9.21 | 0.0320* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Root dry weight | Model | 40.45 | 2 | 20.22 | 15.24 | 0.0130* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between the biomasses (fresh and dry) of shoots and roots of Calathea insignis and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Quadratic regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on the plant height, the longest root length, crown breadth, and leaf number of Calathea insignis.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Parameter | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Plant height | Model | 1.41E03 | 2 | 703.19 | 13.84 | 0.0160* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Longest root length | Model | 315.40 | 2 | 157.70 | 3.80 | 0.1190 n.s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Crown breadth | Model | 316.26 | 2 | 158.13 | 5.41 | 0.0730 n.s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Leaf number | Model | 1.04E03 | 2 | 521.68 | 22.60 | 0.0070** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between the plant height, the longest root length, crown breadth, and leaf number of Calathea insignis and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Figure 5Effects of the CGW:P ratio on the biomasses of shoots and roots of Calathea insignis.
The quadratic regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown.
Figure 6Effects of the CGW:P ratio on the growth parameters of Calathea insignis.
The quadratic regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown.
Quadratic regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on some characteristics of Calathea insignis roots.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Root characteristic | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Total root length | Model | 4.28E05 | 2 | 2.14E05 | 5.22 | 0.0770 n.s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Total root surface area | Model | 1.16E05 | 2 | 5.78E04 | 15.12 | 0.0140* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Average root diameter | Model | 0.65 | 2 | 0.33 | 6.47 | 0.0560 n.s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Total root volume | Model | 123.24 | 2 | 61.62 | 4.91 | 0.0840 n.s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Total number of root tips | Model | 2.57E07 | 2 | 1.29E07 | 12.09 | 0.0200* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between some characteristics of Calathea insignis roots and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Figure 7Effects of the CGW:P ratio on some characteristics of Calathea insignis root systems.
The quadratic regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown.
Quadratic regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on the contents of macro-nutrients (TN, TP, TK, Ca, and Mg) in Calathea insignis leaves.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Macro-nutrient | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| TN | Model | 1.61 | 2 | 0.81 | 7.70 | 0.0430* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| TP | Model | 0.005 | 2 | 0.002 | 9.03 | 0.0330* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| TK | Model | 4.60 | 2 | 2.30 | 13.09 | 0.0180* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Ca | Model | 0.10 | 2 | 0.05 | 4.59 | 0.0920n.s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Mg | Model | 0.08 | 2 | 0.04 | 3.03 | 0.1580n.s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between the contents of macro-nutrients (TN, TP, TK, Ca, and Mg) in Calathea insignis leaves and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Quadratic regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on the contents of micro-nutrients (Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, and B) in Calathea insignis leaves.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Micro-nutrient | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Fe | Model | 24.36 | 2 | 12.18 | 11.74 | 0.0210* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Cu | Model | 0.12 | 2 | 0.06 | 11.00 | 0.0240* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Mn | Model | 6.50 | 2 | 3.25 | 19.40 | 0.0090** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Zn | Model | 0.52 | 2 | 0.26 | 24.33 | 0.0060** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| B | Model | 0.63 | 2 | 0.32 | 10.12 | 0.0270* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between the contents of micro-nutrients (Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, and B) in Calathea insignis leaves and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Figure 8Effects of the CGW:P ratio on the contents of macro-nutrients in Calathea insignis leaves.
The quadratic regression equations, line of best fits, F values, and adjusted R values are shown.
Figure 9Effects of the CGW:P ratio on the contents of micro-nutrients in Calathea insignis leaves.
The quadratic regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown.
Quadratic regression (with ANOVA) statistics describing the effects of the CGW:P ratio on the photosynthetic pigment contents (based on fresh weight) in Calathea insignis leaves.
| ANOVA table | ||||||
| Pigment | Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square |
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Chlorophyll-a | Model | 16.15 | 2 | 8.07 | 21.94 | 0.0070** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Chlorophyll-b | Model | 1.00 | 2 | 0.48 | 20.81 | 0.0080** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Total chlorophyll | Model | 25.00 | 2 | 12.50 | 21.81 | 0.0070** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| SPAD | Model | 610.89 | 2 | 305.45 | 29.26 | 0.0040** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Chlorophyll a/b ratio | Model | 0.44 | 2 | 0.22 | 10.79 | 0.0240* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Carotenoids | Model | 2.50 | 2 | 1.25 | 11.88 | 0.0210* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Carotenoids/Chlorophyll ratio | Model | 0.14 | 2 | 0.07 | 12.02 | 0.0200* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
The p-value indicates the probability of a significant relationship between the photosynthetic pigment contents (based on fresh weight) in Calathea insignis leaves and the CGW:P ratio. F test is significant at n.s. p>0.05; *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01; * p<0.05. n.s.: Non-significant at p>0.05.
Figure 10Effects of the CGW:P ratio on photosynthetic pigment contents in Calathea insignis leaves.
The quadratic regression equations, lines of best fit, F values, and adjusted R values are shown.