| Literature DB >> 24204859 |
Janett Fischer1, Stephan Böhm, Tobias Müller, Heiko Witt, Christoph Sarrazin, Simone Susser, Pascal Migaud, Eckart Schott, Graeme Stewart, Annika Brodzinski, Balazs Fülöp, Florian van Bömmel, Jacob George, Thomas Berg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Genetic variations near the interferon lambda 3 gene (IFNL3, IL28B) are the most powerful predictors for sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, compared to other biochemical or histological baseline parameters. We evaluated whether the interplay of both IFNL3 polymorphisms rs12979860 and rs8099917 together with non-genetic clinical factors contributes to the predictive role of these genetic variants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24204859 PMCID: PMC3812277 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patients’ characteristics of the evaluation and replication cohort.
| Parameter | Evaluation cohort (EC) | Replication cohort (RC) | ||
|
| 1000 | 402 | ||
|
| 46 (39, 54) | 47 (40, 56) | ||
|
| 55%/45% | 51%/49% | ||
|
| 61 (38, 97) | 72 (45, 111) | ||
|
| 43 (29, 65) | 49 (33, 72) | ||
|
| 47 (24, 87) | 54 (28, 101) | ||
|
| 0.8 (0.4, 1.4) | 0.7 (0.4, 1.3) | ||
|
| 0.7 (0.6, 0.9) | 0.7 (0.6, 0.9) | ||
|
| n = 492 | 0.8 (0.5, 1.7) | n = 263 | 0.2 (0.4, 1.0) |
|
| n = 505 | 91 (70, 119) | n = 279 | 96 (73, 132) |
|
| n = 632 | 170 (147, 196) | n = 335 | 177 (156, 200) |
|
| n = 612 | 93 (67, 133) | n = 320 | 96 (74, 143) |
|
| n = 665 | 0.7 (0.4, 0.9) | n = 309 | 0.6 (0.3, 0.8) |
|
| n = 492 | 203 (157, 249) | n = 263 | 222 (176, 265) |
|
| n = 923 | 5.8 (5.3, 6.2) | n = 379 | 5.8 (5.3, 6.2) |
|
| ||||
|
| n = 401 | 16%/64%/17%/3% | n = 256 | 65%/26%/6%/3% |
|
| ||||
|
| n = 848 | 16%/38%/26%/13%/7% | n = 370 | 19%/35%/24%/12%/10% |
|
| n = 848 | 9% | n = 370 | 11% |
|
| ||||
|
| n = 792 | 5%/42%44%/9% | n = 327 | 8%/46%/40%/6% |
|
| ||||
|
| n = 955 | 46%/35%/19% | n = 343 | 42%/41%/17% |
median plus interquartile range (25th, 75th percentile), SVR: sustained virologic response, NR: non-response, IU: international units.
Genotype frequencies and sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of IFNL3 rs12979860 and rs8099917 SNPs in the evaluation and replication cohort.
| Evaluation cohort | Replication cohort | ||||
| Genotype | Frequency (%) | SVR (%) | Frequency (%) | SVR (%) | |
|
|
| 31 | 65 | 29 | 57 |
|
| 53 | 38 | 53 | 35 | |
|
| 16 | 31 | 18 | 37 | |
|
|
| 50 | 58 | 51 | 51 |
|
| 43 | 33 | 42 | 30 | |
|
| 7 | 31 | 7 | 39 | |
Figure 1Association of IFNL3 variants with baseline predictors.
Association of the IFNL3 rs12979860 and rs8099917 genotypes with the levels of (A) GGT (IU/mL), (B) ALT (IU/mL), (C) GGT/ALT ratio, (D) pretreatment HCV RNA log10 (IU/mL) and (E) cholesterol (mg/dL) concentration in the evaluation cohort (EC). Horizontal bars represent the median. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the baseline parameter.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors predictive for sustained virologic response (SVR).
| Evaluation cohort | Replication cohort | |||||||
| Parameter | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||
| OR [95% CI] | P | OR [95% CI] | P | OR [95% CI] | P | OR [95% CI] | P | |
|
| 0.96 [0.94–0.97] | 7.7×10−13 | 0.93 [0.91–0.95] | 7.5×10−11 | ||||
|
| 0.61 [0.50–0.74] | 3.4×10−7 | 0.61 [0.39–0.95] | 0.028 | 0.57 (0.42–0.78] | 0.001 | 0.43 [0.22–0.84] | 0.001 |
|
| 0.99 [0.98–0.99] | 1.4×10−14 | 0.99 [0.99–1.00] | 0.0002 | ||||
|
| 0.45 [0.38–0.55] | 7.2×10−16 | 0.45 [0.24–0.82] | 0.010 | 0.52 [0.38–0.71] | 4.5×10−5 | 0.60 [0.40–0.693] | 0.021 |
|
| 0.39 [0.29–0.70] | 0.0004 | 0.42 [0.19–0.91] | 0.027 | ||||
|
| 0.99 [0.99–1.00] | 0.003 | 0.99 [0.99–1.00] | 0.001 | ||||
|
| 1.01 [1.00–1.01] | 1.6×10−5 | 1.01 [1.00–1.02] | 2.9×10−6 | ||||
|
| 1.01 [1.00–1.01] | 0.009 | 1.01 [1.00–1.02] | 0.018 | ||||
|
| 0.87 [0.77–0.97] | 0.014 | 0.71 [0.53–0.94] | 0.016 | ||||
|
| 0.50 [0.29–0.87] | 0.013 | 0.38 [0.21–0.68] | 0.001 | ||||
|
| 0.49 [0.37–2.70] | 8.2×10−7 | 2.79 [1.68–4.63] | 6.9×10−5 | ||||
|
| 0.27 [0.15–0.50] | 3.6×10−5 | 0.10 [0.02–0.44] | 0.002 | ||||
|
| 1.32 [1.02–1.70] | 0.036 | 1.69 [1.10–2.61] | 0.017 | ||||
|
| 1.03 [1.02–1.04] | 1.2×10−7 | 1.04 [1.01–1.06] | 0.005 | ||||
|
| 3.28 [2.46–4.37] | 4.0×10−17 | 4.22 [1.76–10.15] | 0.001 | 2.42 [1.51–3.89] | 0.0003 | 4.57 [1.71–12.22] | 0.002 |
|
| 2.84 [2.18–3.70] | 9.0×10−14 | 2.36 [1.514–4.91] | 0.021 | 2.27 [1.46–3.53] | 0.0003 | 2.33 [1.07–5.08] | 0.013 |
OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, P = p-value, IU: international units.
Figure 2Impact of IFNL3 variants and baseline predictors on sustained virologic response (SVR).
SVR rates in the evaluation (EC) and replication cohort (RC) with regard to (A) GGT/ALT ratio and HCV RNA concentration according to IFNL3 rs12979860 and rs8099917 genotypes in combination and with (B) GGT/ALT ratio cutoff value of 0.70, (C) HCV RNA concentration cut-off value of 5.8log10 (IU/mL). Pearson’s χ2 test and Fischer’s exact test were used to compare the SVR rates.
Figure 3Combined determination of IFNL3 variants, GGT/ALT ratio and HCV RNA levels improved sustained virologic response (SVR) rates.
SVR rates in the evaluation (EC) and replication cohort (RC) according to IFNL3 (A) rs12979860 and (B) rs8099917 genotypes after adjustment for the GGT/ALT ratio (cut-off value 0.70) and HCV RNA concentration (cut-off value 5.8log10).
Figure 4Impact of the GGT/ALT ratio on sustained virologic response (SVR) according to the IFNL3 polymorphisms.
GGT/ALT affects responsiveness of IFNL3 (A) rs12979860 and (B) rs8099917 and the combination (C) rs12979860/rs8099917 in the overall cohort (n = 1402); depicted as single values with linear regression curves. The dashed line indicates the normal GGT/ALT ratio.